Coalition Get Set to Scrap the RET

With Tony Abbott’s sweep to victory comes the prospect of putting some sense back into Australian energy policy.

Here’s one of his number – Dennis Jensen – writing in The Australian last Friday.

dennis jensen

Dennis Jensen – Member for Tangey.

Profitable path to sustainability
The Australian
Dennis Jensen
27 September, 2013

BJORN Lomborg has stated “if it is not economic, it is not sustainable”. That single statement encapsulates all that is wrong with the climate change debate. It also points to a potential solution.

For those who know me, don’t be confused. I have not changed my view that human activity is not a major driver of global warming.

Indeed, the more than decade-long lack of warming, opposed to the warming predicted by the global circulation models referred to by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, simply reinforces my view.

The problem is the debate has become polarised. Perhaps what is needed is refocusing on how a position can be reached where there is benefit to people on all sides of the argument.

Looking at the past, punitive measures have been recommended and put in place.

First the carbon tax, followed by emissions trading the last government put in place. The latter is the worst of all worlds, as it ends up with the effective payment of “indulgences” to overseas carbon traders for shonky carbon credits while emissions in Australia continue to increase.

Direct action nobly tries to move towards a reward structure to reduce emissions within Australia, but even it is less than optimal, considering Lomborg’s statement. Another scheme that lamentably fails the Lomborg test is that of the Renewable Energy Target, which is certainly worse than direct action and should be dumped.

Forcing the generators to use uneconomic methods of generating power is a sop to green carpetbaggers, costing the Australian community dearly.

For the sake of argument, let’s assume the most catastrophic climate projections are correct. Even if Australia completely ceased emitting anthropogenic carbon dioxide tomorrow, the net “benefit” in terms of forestalling temperature increases is vanishingly close to zero.

The simple fact is, even under this scenario, the only way to help the situation is to come up with a global solution that conforms with the need to be economic to be sustainable.

At present the only methods of generating power that emit minimal levels of carbon dioxide conforming to this proposition are nuclear power and hydroelectricity, both of which the green and other left movements see as anathema. Other methods such as wind and solar are a long way from being able to generate baseload power economically.

So, what can be done? Instead of foisting uneconomic “solutions” on the market, we need to find ways of making alternatives economic (and for those who argue renewables are economically competitive, the reality check is the generators would jump on them if they were, no subsidies or RETs required). The show stopper for most of the alternatives is economically competitive energy storage.

We should address this at the cheap end of the innovation pipeline – research! Australia should commit to providing significant funding for energy storage research.

The government should stay away from cherry-picking the research proposals. Selection of the most worthy research proposals should be left to the Australian Research Council.

By putting money into energy research, many benefits will follow. For those concerned with global warming, it provides potential for a real energy solution globally that conforms to Lomborg’s statement and would have global energy consequences.

For Australia, it provides a realistic prospect for large windfalls as a result of the intellectual property generated, giving a positive return on the investment put into the research, unlike the other methods of trying to solve the anthropogenic global warming problem, which are a financial burden to Australians. Last, but by no means least, it provides a means of reinvigorating our struggling science sector, giving realistic prospects of careers in scientific research and improving the quality of the intake of those aiming for a science-related profession.

Win, win, win – plus the prospect of coming up with a path on the climate change issue on which most, if not all, could agree.

Former CSIRO research scientist and defence analyst Dennis Jensen is the federal Liberal member for Tangney in Western Australia.
The Australian

STT is all for research – but why re-invent the wheel?

Dennis – if you’re looking for a cheap, sustainable form of renewable energy storage – look no further than a deep gully on the Great Dividing Range.  All you need is a dam wall, some pipes – add a little water – and gravity will do the rest.

There are over 70 hydro-power projects already scoped out from Victoria to Northern Queensland just waiting for the Federal Government to scrap the current RET policy that perversely favours wind power – and to create a realistic and sustainable renewable energy policy.

The last lot were clearly Nation wreckers – and Australians voted to get rid of them.

Here’s your chance Dennis – try thinking like a Nation builder.

Team up with Angus “the Enforcer” Taylor who knows a thing or two about Hydro – his grandfather, Sir William Hudson built the Snowy Mountain Scheme – and see if you can’t make renewable energy policy work FOR Australians – not AGAINST them as the current RET legislation most certainly is.

snowy hydro

Want endless, cheap, clean and reliable sparks?
Just add water.

About stopthesethings

We are a group of citizens concerned about the rapid spread of industrial wind power generation installations across Australia.

Comments

  1. “if it is not economic, it is not sustainable”.

    Well, some sick heads who unfortunately describe themselves as “environmentalists” have worked out an alternative pathway to sustainability by stuffing wind turbines in every landscape possible: economic collapse and desolation, health problems and misery.

  2. Jackie Rovenksy says:

    We obviously need hydro energy, but in SA there appears to be no way we can take this road, but hot rocks may be our contribution.
    However, while we are looking for ways to make cheap and environmentally sound energy, we should also look at ways we can remove the emissions already in the atmosphere. Forests and peat bogs are great at capturing it, but both are being destroyed to make room for Industrial Wind Turbines and their infrastructure. Great Environmentally friendly lot these turbine people.

  3. Kill off the Nation wreckers, bring on the Nation Builders!

  4. Bring on Hydro Power

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: