Angus “The Enforcer” Taylor – collars another pro-wind-power-punk

The adage that you can’t keep a good man down applies in spades to Angus “The Enforcer” Taylor.

The wind weasels have been running a campaign to undermine Angus – including laughable claims made in the Fin Review last week that he’d been privately “slapped down” by energy policy lightweights, Greg Hunt and Ian “Enron” Macfarlane. Nice try – boys.

The wind industry is also trying to slam Angus as “anti-renewable” – like it’s a “crime against humanity”.  No – Angus isn’t “anti-renewable” just “anti-intermittent, unreliable, heavily subsidised WIND POWER”.  On the contrary, here he is at the National Rally setting out how REAL base-load renewable generation runs through his veins :

****

****

And a greentard named Ferrara also tried taking a few pot shots at Angus, but clean missed his mark.  Oops….

Dirty-Harry-killer

I’m not having Taylor upset the greatest rort in history.

Unfazed  – The Enforcer calmly drew his .44 Magnum and returned fire . *. *. * .

dirty harry2

A man’s gotta know his limitations.

The Goulburn Post reports on the ensuing carnage.

The exorbitant costs of the RECs
The Goulburn Post
Angus Taylor
10 August 2013

MR Ferrara (Hardly an Energetic Vision, June28) raises and conflates many issues in his letter about my position on wind farm subsidies, energy policy and a sustainable future.

Readers should know that Mr Ferrara has previously queried my claims, but has not accepted an invitation to meet with me, or call me to discuss the economics of wind farms.  Instead, he writes to the paper and makes errors and many false assumptions about my position.

He is entirely incorrect to say that I advocate coal seam gas extraction in Hume.

This is just patently wrong.  I am confident there will be no established coal seam gas industry in Hume.  First, there will be none in Goulburn as there is no coal seam gas here.

In Wollondilly and the Southern Highlands where it exists in very small amounts and is of very poor quality, I have the same confidence.  It simply does not make sense at so many levels.  I have stated in press releases and said many times on radio that there is no shortage of gas away from sensitive areas like Wollondilly and the Southern Highlands, especially in far western Queensland, Northern South Australia, Bass Strait and offshore of Gippsland.

We have enough gas in these places to avoid threats to water aquifers or prime agricultural land, whilst meeting our energy needs.

Elly Spark (Subsidy Begs Clarification, July 3) suggests that the extra ‘green energy’ option that she chooses and many others pay in electricity bills (an extra 3 cents per kilowatt hour) must be what I am referring to when I talk about subsidies.  The extra green tariff in your electricity bill is a choice that you make to pay over and above the price of electricity charged by your electricity retailer.  That is obviously not a subsidy.

This optional extra cost is most certainly not what I am referring to when I talk about the wind turbine subsidies.

The subsidies for new wind turbines ($400,000 – $800,000 per annum per turbine depending on the size of the turbine and the price of certificates) are built into the price of electricity of every electricity consumer in the nation.

It operates through the federal renewable energy scheme which mandates the Renewable Energy Target (RET).  Electricity retailers are required by federal legislation to provide a certain amount of renewable energy to the electricity grid.

If they do not make the renewable energy themselves (and most don’t) then they need to purchase it.  The legislative scheme requires the electricity retailers to purchase renewable energy certificates (RECs) before they can sell any kind of electricity.  The wind industry exists purely to provide the RECs to the energy retailers so they can comply with the legislation.

About half of the revenue received by a wind turbine is not from the generation of green energy sold to the grid, but from the revenue that wind companies receive because electricity retailers are required to buy RECs from them.

The figures I use are not difficult to justify.

They are based on very simple maths, and work completed by the (now) Chairman of the ACCC, Rod Simms, who was then a partner of mine in my consulting firm which does a great deal of work in the energy sector.

Incidentally, the wind industry executives and economists I have spoken to at length and in person in recent months (and there have been a few!) whilst unhappy about my public position, accept the correctness of the numbers I have published.

They also grudgingly accept it is correct for me to label these payments to wind companies for the RECs as ‘subsidies’ to the wind industry.

The exorbitant costs of RECs flows through to the cost of electricity, making it much higher for every electricity consumer in the nation.

Of course, this operates most unfairly against the needy and the poor, for whom the price of electricity is becoming utterly prohibitive.  They are paying as much as the wealthy for this massive ‘green’ component in our electricity bills.  The madness of this scheme is that we could reduce our emissions just as effectively by using other, much cheaper means.

I am all for renewable energy and always have been.  Climate change has been a concern of mine for twenty five years – well before it became a mainstream political issue.

The problem I have with the wind turbine subsidies is that they are crowding out other, much cheaper means of reducing carbon emissions.  It is economic lunacy and bad public policy.

The sooner ordinary Australians come to realise the facts, the sooner we can have a real debate about whether it is in our nation’s interest to continue on with this scheme which does not merely prop up an industry (like the car industry) but has actually created an industry.  Mr Ferrara, this is most definitely not ‘ideological cherry picking’ on my part.

This is about economics, and a massive, unintended public policy failure.

The absurdity of the economics of wind farms actually answers another of Mr Ferrara’s questions.  What would I do with the subsidies in Hume?

I would purchase equivalent carbon emission reductions on the market at around $20-25/ tonne – a figure accepted by Treasury and well above the current European price.

In other words, I would achieve equivalent carbon emissions reductions by other, cheaper means.

With the leftover money I would then duplicate the Barton Highway for around $500 million, I would re-build the Goulburn Hospital, I would quickly fix the mobile phone and internet coverage across the electorate, get rid of demountables in some of our schools and fix every pothole in our roads.  And that’s just in the first few years.

As I say, this reveals the utter absurdity of the subsidies to this industry.

Mr Ferrara, if you have anything else on your wish list let me know.
The Goulburn Post

Angus Taylor

Ya feelin’ lucky punks? Well do ya?

About stopthesethings

We are a group of citizens concerned about the rapid spread of industrial wind power generation installations across Australia.

Comments

  1. Stand against wind says:

    A great summary, we should all be writing something similar to our own local papers!

  2. Jackie Rovensky says:

    How it is that people cannot understand the simple mathematics of the con we are being subjected to astounds me. Watch the TV and listen to the Greens and those who aspire to be seen as ‘green’ – are they really so stupid? They continue to discount the fact and continue to push there unsustainable ideology. When will they all accept they can do more good by being ‘in this world’ than living on ‘cloud nine’.

  3. Terry Conn says:

    Congratulations to Mr Taylor for succinctly summarising the fundamental absurdity of allowing the wind industry to cash in on the unintended consequences of the original idea behind the Federal Renewable Energy (Electricity) Act. At the very least the Act needs to be amended to only allow RECs for renewable energy that provides ‘base load’ power and can demonstrate an actual reduction of GHG emissions within the total National Electricity Market without destroying our industry and national wealth. Wind farms are useless in every respect and until a ‘real’ renewable alternative appears then gas is a sensible alternative to coal– just ask the Americans!

  4. Thanks Angus – with your economic credentials I certainly am convinced that we need to change our energy policies.

    Wind energy has been a disastrous experiment for the rural people who were unlucky enough to be duped into allowing them into their areas. It makes me angry the more I find out how these turbines will do nothing for the climate yet they are so destructive to our environment (animals, people, land filled with concrete). I despair for the economic health of our nation as Australia sinks further and further in debt funding these ridiculous and unreliable power generators. Let’s shift our policy and funding towards base load renewables. Angus, I think you are the man for the job.

  5. Reblogged this on Mothers Against Wind Turbines and commented:
    More proof of the futility of the windscam.

  6. Angus Taylor, there are people in the renewable industry that couldn’t care less about this Country of ours as they are only in it for the fraudulent money.

    The wind weasels and greentards are the same, not interested in making this lovely Nation of ours a better place to live, all they are intrestered in is making big amounts of money, and to hell with people’s health.

    The Greens Party could not care less about the Australian Citizens that have to live next to these turbines. SHAME ON YOU CHRISTINE MILNE.

Trackbacks

  1. […] to call Angus “the Enforcer” Taylor “anti-renewable” is specious in the extreme. Angus is a huge fan of hydro – not […]

  2. […] “The Boss” Boswell is leading the charge and Angus “the Enforcer” Taylor is providing solid […]

  3. […] up with Angus “the Enforcer” Taylor who knows a thing or two about Hydro – his grandfather, Sir William Hudson built the Snowy […]

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: