Cost of Wind Power Outstrips Coal, Gas, Hydro & Nukes by a Country Mile

wind-turbine-money

Wind worshippers continue to make wild claims about wind power already being “free” – and, apparently, getting cheaper all the time.

Although, it appears that ‘selling’ a product with no commercial value (apart from the massive subsidies it attracts) is an unwinnable battle. Even the merest mention of a cut to subsidies has the wind industry’s parasites quaking in their boots.

Fudging numbers; and inventing them, when that fails to cut it, is standard operating procedure for the wind industry, its parasites and spruikers. However, their wild claims about being ‘competitive’ with conventional generation sources are getting harder to ‘sell’, by the day.

Thomas F. Stacy, George Taylor from the Institute for Energy Research published a paper a couple of months back – “The Levelized Cost of Electricity from Existing Generation Sources”, which has infuriated the wind industry in the States and beyond. Here’s a neat little wrap up of its wind power fraud destroying properties.

Study: Wind Electricity Several Times as Expensive as Conventional Sources
Heartland
Brady Nelson
7 October 2015

On average, electricity from new wind resources is nearly four times as expensive as that from existing nuclear sources and nearly three times as expensive as using existing coal sources, a new study by the Institute for Energy Research (IER) reports.

The study, What is the True Cost of Electricity?, used data from the Energy Information Administration and the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission.

“This study points to the need to let economic decisions about energy be made on a commercial basis rather than on a political basis,” said Mark Jamison, Ph.D., director of the Public Utility Research Center at the University of Florida . “Too often people suffer from the illusion of knowledge and, believing they know what investments others should make, support political decision-making that favors one technology over another.”

Apples to Apples

Until this report, almost all measures of the cost of electricity only assessed costs involved in building new plants. In contrast, IER compares existing plants to new ones.

Comparing new renewables to existing traditional electric generating sources, IER found, existing coal cost $38.4 per megawatt-hour on average (MWh), natural gas cost $48.9 MWh, and nuclear cost $29.6 MWh, each approximately one-third or at most half of the cost of new wind generation sources, $112.8 MWh on average.

Despite facing significantly stricter regulations, the study found, even new coal, gas, and nuclear plants, at $97.7, $73.4 and $92.7 per MWh respectively, cost less than new wind power generation.

Renewables Cheapness ‘Patently False’

Discussing the findings of the study, IER economist Travis Fisher said, “The notion that wind and solar power are becoming cheaper than sources like coal and nuclear is patently false.”

“This narrative tends to compare only brand-new power plants—highly subsidized wind and solar installments—to coal plants paralyzed by costly and unprecedented regulations,” said Fisher. “The implication is there is no longer a cost premium in replacing the output of today’s existing coal plants with power from wind and solar facilities, never mind the obvious reliability problems in attempting to do that.”

The IER study arrived amid estimates existing and proposed federal and state policies threaten to shutter more than 111 GW of existing coal and nuclear generation, while forcing large amounts of renewables (such as wind) onto the grid.

“Coal-fired capacity is being shut down before the end of its economic and depreciable life,” said Jim Clarkson, president of Resource Supply Management (RSM). “The scheme for replacement is renewable capacity,… [which] must be backed up by natural gas-fired capacity and its attendant capital recovery.”

As a result, Clarkson warns, “Consumers will pay three times for capacity for the same output.”

Fisher concurs with Clarkson’s assessment. “Policies that shut down existing coal plants and prop up wind and solar—such as the EPA’s carbon regulation—will inevitably increase the cost of electricity and increase the financial burden of everyone with an electricity bill, particularly low-income Americans,” Fisher said.

Brady Nelson (darren.nelson@me.com) is a columnist with Townhall.
Heartland

turbine collapse 9

Wind power cost claims just don’t stand up …

About stopthesethings

We are a group of citizens concerned about the rapid spread of industrial wind power generation installations across Australia.

Comments

  1. Reblogged this on citizenpoweralliance.

  2. Reblogged this on pattikellar and commented:
    “Too often people suffer from the illusion of knowledge and, believing they know what investments others should make, support political decision-making that favors one technology over another.”

  3. Reblogged this on Climatism and commented:
    There will soon come a time when industrial windmills will finally have a productive use in society, as abandoned, bent and rusted-out reminders of the collective eco madness that wracked humanity.

    Wind and solar, as base-load energy alternatives, remain nothing more than token gestures to the folly of green madness.

Trackbacks

  1. […] with conventional generation sources are getting harder to ‘sell’, by the day. – Click here to read the full article […]

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: