Rampant Wind Turbine Bird Slaughter Pushes Vulnerable Species to the Edge of Extinction

stone age cave dweller

Centuries from now – archaeologists and palaeontologists will be sifting through what were communities of isolated-candle-lit hovels and find the remains of the 21st Century wind-worship-cult that ended up living in the Stone Age poverty that they were ready to foist upon everybody else.

As they unravel the secrets of what led to the great wind power fraud – that will then be ancient history – the experts will be more than a little perplexed at how these people were able to generate foaming outrage – on the one hand – and malign indifference – on the other – when faced with identical avian outcomes.

Every time an oil rig blows up or an oil tanker runs aground – the faux ‘green’ is the first to howl “blue murder” and demand an end to the oil industry, as soon as birds start washing up on a beach drenched in the black sticky stuff.

Gulf Oil Spill

At least he survived his brush with the energy business.

****

Photos and footage of the Deepwater Horizon disaster in the Gulf of Mexico and the Exxon Valdez spill filled our papers and TV screens for years afterwards – with well-meaning environmentalists gently washing birds and other critters back to health. No criticism there – nothing wrong with a little human compassion for our feathered friends.

However – the game changes when the wind-worshipper is confronted with birds and bats being belted for 6 or sliced to ribbons by these things: something in the their wiring triggers a ‘logic-fault’, that means they simply can’t connect turbines with the death and destruction they cause.

Is it good old hypocrisy? Is it selective thinking? Is it the fact that their simplistic world view reduces all equations to: “green” – GOOD and fossil fuel – BAD?

Whatever it is – it demonstrates an inability to apply logic to a given situation and the absence of any guiding principle – a point well made by James Lovelock.

If human activity causing death and harm to wildlife is abhorrent and cause for outrage in one circumstance – then – as a matter of principle – it should be abhorrent in all circumstances. Or does greentard thinking – if that’s what it is – reduce to the old chestnut about “the greater good”?

For some birds negotiating 56m blades with their outer tips doing over 350km/h is just case of keeping your head – or NOT. This little encounter with the wind industry was reported by James Delingpole a while back:

Seagull_head_11

Hard to keep your head when all those around you are losing theirs.

****

And then there was the story of a rare sighting  of a White-Throated Needletail in the Hebrides, off the coast of Scotland. Twitchers rushed to the island in the hope of a confirmed sighting, only to see their prize collide with one of these things, knocking it out the sky and off to the promised land – thereby giving the assembled twitchers a chance to verify their ‘sighting’ with absolute certainty: Twitchers given rare treat by turbine

dead needletail

These things take all the guess work out of twitching.

****

Bats cop it too – with the pressure shock waves from the blades crushing their little lungs:

bat

****

As these things go up around the Globe the numbers of birds and bats killed by turbine blades will only increase and reach hundreds of millions each year. In Spain alone, wind farms are killing between 6,000,000 and 18,000,000 birds every year. The figures come from 136 monitoring studies collected by the Spanish Ornithological Society. Here’s one take on the numbers killed by the Spectator.

A recent study in the US shows that the numbers of bird deaths accredited to turbines underestimates the true figure by more than 30%. (for the full story refer Smallwood, K Shawn. 2013. Comparing bird and bat fatality-rate estimates among North American wind-energy projects. Wildlife Society Bulletin 37: 19-33.)

In Australia, a 10-year study points to these things constituting a wholly unjustified mortal threat to a clearly vulnerable, and increasingly threatened species, the White-Throated Needletail Swift – the very same kind of rare bird that twitchers witnessed being clobbered in the Hebrides.

Now you see them … Finding the White-throated Needletail
Australian Birdlife
Mike Tarburton
15 December 2015

Capable of flying at great speeds to heights beyond the detection of the human eye, the White-throated Needletail is becoming even more elusive, according to Australia’s leading swift expert, Mike Tarburton.

During the last austral season of the White-throated Needletail, I spent more time than in previous seasons scanning the skies over Victorian forests through binoculars. For entire days at a time I would search at sites that I knew these birds used for both feeding and as flyways. One needletail flock was above me at the Helipad in Bunyip State Park for two-and-a-half hours, but only came low enough for any of them to be seen without binoculars for just six minutes. At other times, both in that spot and at the Gentle Annie section of the park, flocks were above me for an hour or two without ever coming low enough to be seen without binoculars. This means they remained between approximately 900 metres and 1.7 kilometres above the ground.

This phenomenon of high altitude feeding and travel is not surprising. White-throated Needletails have a high proportion of haemoglobin in their blood, allowing them to gather the maximum amount of oxygen from the thinner air of high elevations as they chase the many insects that fly at these levels. What is exciting about watching needletails at high altitudes is that once they have eaten enough to feel content, they divide into pairs and perform coordinated flight displays. The two birds remain a set distance apart (between 20 centimetres and 2 metres), while they perform loops, sharp turns, barrel-rolls, and high-speed dives, in what one Russian observer described as gliding “connected by an invisible thread.”

If you are fortunate enough to see these dives, which commence at 1.5 kilometres up and plummet down to tree-top level, you will receive an adrenalin rush as they easily pass the 200 kilometres per hour limit—before bouncing back up and out of normal vision.

On a March day at the Upper Yarra Reservoir Lookout, I had been watching five pairs performing exclusively at great heights for nearly an hour, when some moved to the hill that the lookout is on and started doing power-dives down the side. This meant some of them passed over the lookout, and the roar of the wind in their wings amazed me, even though I have heard it before from birds at slower speeds in Queensland and New South Wales.

I have measured the flight speed of White-rumped Swiftlets entering the huge cave in which they sleep in Fiji at speeds of up to 106 kilometres per hour, and of Australian Swiftlets entering their cave at Chillagoe at speeds of up to 111 kilometres per hour. They were exciting experiences, but nowhere near the excitement generated while watching needletails perform their power dives in the open sky.

If we can extrapolate from the knowledge gained through European studies of the Common Swift, then at least part of the reason it is advantageous to maintain their pair bond while wintering in the southern hemisphere is that paired birds are able to start breeding earlier than unpaired birds. This means they can choose the best nest sites—with little competition—close to good feeding areas in their prime breeding grounds in Siberia. As a result, they raise more young than late nesters.

The problem is that finding good breeding sites is becoming more difficult in Siberia, due to the increasing rate of logging the Taiga forests, which our birds are dependent on for nest hollows. Russian research indicates that the needletails breed in tall, hollow stumps of poplars, spruces, larches and oaks along rivers and around swamps. The water and low swamp vegetation allows the birds clear air spaces to approach their nesting hollows, and the water also provides the abundant supply of aquatic insects that they feed on. They will also breed in stumps in small fire-cleared patches, but where clear-felling has occurred over large areas, there are no stumps left for breeding.

Much of the logging is illegal and clear-felling is common practice, leaving no mature trees at all—so no hollows. In 2013, WWF Moscow reported that illegal logging had reached crisis proportions in the Russian Far East, with the volume of Mongolian Oak logged between 2004 and 2011 exceeding authorised logging by 200-400 per cent. In 2010, the former head of the Primorsky Province forest Management agency, Pyotr Diuk, stated that 400-500 per cent more than the annual legal logging limit had been harvested each year under his control, and that in five years there would be no more oak, and in 10 years no more ash. That five-year prediction is up this year, and means a lot fewer nesting sites for our needletails.

The WWF added that the exhaustion of valuable hardwood stocks in managed forests due to timber theft is driving legal and illegal loggers into sensitive areas not zoned for commercial logging, including declared wildlife reserves. One local source, who must remain anonymous for his own safety, shared with me how loggers would set the forest alight, take photos, send them to authorities in Moscow and claim that the fire had destroyed a much larger amount of the forest, then harvest that amount.

This has meant a significant decline in the average flock size in Australia every decade since 1950. In a 2014 article in Australian Field Ornithology, I analysed pooled data from across Australia that demonstrated numbers had dropped by almost three quarters. This and other studies have led BirdLife Australia’s Research and Conservation Committee to uplist the conservation status of the White-throated Needletail to Vulnerable. If needletails are in decline, how is it that we still get a few flocks of a thousand birds? Particularly in the last three seasons, with abnormal weather patterns, the birds have grouped more than usual in south-eastern Queensland and north-eastern NSW, for longer than usual, before many moved on to southern NSW, Victoria and Tasmania.

The evidence for this is that while some observers in Brisbane and south-eastern Queensland saw birds on many occasions, others nearby did not see their first flock until January, and then saw very few afterwards. When flock sizes and frequency of sightings in Queensland declined, the number of sightings and flock sizes increased further south—showing that the extra large flocks came from northern and southern birds mixing around south-eastern Queensland.

It would be all too easy to sit back and blame others for the steep decline in needletails. However, these birds also face a series of problems while in Australia. Some of the greatest declines have been over urban areas, such as the airspace above Melbourne’s eastern suburbs which was once a regular summer haunt for needletails, the mix of open space, orchards and market gardens providing a rich source of flying insects. With the spread of housing developments, this source of insects dried up and sightings are now few and far between. Loss of habitat to logging and wildfires can affect local numbers of needletails but apparently not necessarily over the longer term. There are other, less immediately obvious issues that could also be affecting needletail numbers in Australia.

It was also not long ago that we learnt what the natural predator of the needletail is while in Australia. Matthew Stanton conducted his Masters research in the Pilliga Scrub of northern NSW and found needletail remains in 26 regurgitated pellets of the Barking Owl. He also saw on three occasions a needletail come in to roost an hour or so after dark on a vertical ironbark or White Cypress trunk or branch, and a Barking Owl come up from below (thus avoiding its silhouette against the sky) very soon after the needletail had landed. The Barking Owl, itself listed as Vulnerable in NSW, is unlikely to be a major cause of the decline, however, as presumably they have been in Australia for as long as the needletails have, and are thus part of the balanced regulatory mechanisms in the ecosystem.

Ornithologists have usually thought of the Peregrine Falcon as a possible predator, but those I have seen near needletails appeared to know they had met their match, and showed no signs of attack. Chris Lloyd recently watched the interactions between a pair of Peregrine Falcons and a flock of 1,000 White-throated Needletails. His conclusion was that the needletails appeared capable of out-accelerating the falcon both in a straight line and in climbing. Carol Probets has also observed a flock of needletails circling around a chimney where a Peregrine was resting, but no attack was launched. Mick Roderick, myself, and others have observed Peregrine Falcons circling in the same thermal as Needletails, with no obvious interaction, and I am not aware of any evidence of a Peregrine taking a needletail. But keep your eyes peeled!

needletail swift

One emerging threat may well be wind farms. A ten-year study at two wind farms in north-western Tasmania by Cindy Hull and colleagues has shown that although 80 per cent of bird species using the airspace over the wind farms are not affected by the turbines, the White-throated Needletail is the species most killed at one farm, and the second-most killed at the other.

It would be naïve to think the problem existed only in Tasmania. I recently dug out reports from the Atlas of Living Australia for six needletails that were found dead, and when plotting the co-ordinates showed that they all came from a wind farm north of Canberra, and east of Lake George. This is not yet being reported elsewhere, but if we looked I am sure we would find needletails dying at many wind farms in other states.

After all, the death of one bird that strayed to Europe in June 2013, instead of coming to Australia, was killed by a wind-turbine on the Scottish isle of Harris, and was witnessed by many of the 80 British birdwatchers who had gone to the island to see the bird.

So when you are on a suitably elevated viewing site in the forests of eastern Australia between October and April, and are enjoying the mental challenge of following the aerial dances of courting needletails, or just watching them manouvreing effortlessly to catch their prey, take a thought about storing that enjoyment. The birds involved are in serious decline and we are seeing them much less frequently than any time in recorded history.
Australian Birdlife

bird oil meme

About stopthesethings

We are a group of citizens concerned about the rapid spread of industrial wind power generation installations across Australia.

Comments

  1. Crispin Trist says:

    I write in dismay at the RSPB`s (The Royal Society for the Protection of Birds) endorsement of an Ecotricity (Dale Vince) 100m wind turbine at their Lodge headquarters near Sandy in Bedfordshire, UK.

    http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/earth/wildlife/12176938/Controversy-as-RSPB-builds-100m-wind-turbine-despite-deadly-threat-to-birds.html

    Speaking hypothetically, if I were one of the protagonists hatching this evil plan to cover the entire planet in concrete, steel, fibreglass and carbon fibre man made, non human scale spinning structures, what would be one of my major obstacles?

    BIRD fatalities!!!

    So how would I go about quelling public outrage on this issue or interfering with your democratic right to object? Especially when you could see something was wrong here.

    I would start by taking control of this situation so that nobody could complain.

    How would I go about taking control of this situation so that in future if anyone dared to suggest that wind turbines would harm or even kill rare and protected birds, I could ‘shut them up’.

    Ah!!!

    I could point them straight in the direction of the RSPB! Why? Because they are on side. Why? Because one Martin Harper, who was Head of Sustainable Development in 2006, is now Conservation Director of the RSPB, and has overseen the construction of a 100m metre wind turbine at the RSPB’s HQ.

    I would then post links on my website along with all the other ‘Partners’ that are ‘on side’.

    http://www.ecotricity.co.uk/about-ecotricity/team-eco/our-partners

    Who would dare complain then?

    What could there possibly be to complain about? Because all the departments would be behind me. I would build a massive wind turbine on one of the nations busiest highways, the M4, where millions of commuters would pass each day, and subconsciously plant the seeds of my evil plan.

    http://www.ecotricity.co.uk/our-green-energy/our-green-electricity/from-the-wind/wind-parks-gallery/green-park-reading

    Who cares if a few more birds die, especially when they are killed by other means. Why not kill some more!

    Well Vince and Harper.

    GOTCHA!!!

    No lets listen to somebody talking some real sense for a change!

    One Steven Cooper.

  2. videos:

    eagle hit http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=8NAAzBArYdw

    —–

    Wind farms are clusters of turbines as tall as 30-story buildings, with spinning rotors as wide as a passenger jet’s wingspan. Though the blades appear to move slowly, they can reach speeds of up to 170 mph at the tips, creating tornado-like vortexes. http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2014/03/12/house-panel-subpoenas-white-house-on-wind-power-eagle-deaths/

    Bob Sallinger with the Audubon Society of Portland said wind farms across the country have killed more than 80 eagles over the last decade.

    “If you have dozens and dozens of them on the landscape it is basically a giant Cuisinart for birds,” said Sallinger. “Bald eagles took decades to recover … we almost lost them because of DDT. Golden eagles are a species biologists are concerned about because they appear to be declining.” http://www.kgw.com/news/Official-Wind–257599781.html

    “Improperly sited and operated wind energy facilities can kill significant numbers of federally protected birds and other species,” said U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Director Dan Ashe, urging developers to follow the Service’s Land-based Wind Energy Guidelines. “That’s why it’s imperative that wind energy developers work with the Fish and Wildlife Service to minimize these impacts at every stage in the process.”
    Commercial wind power projects can cause the deaths of federally protected birds in four primary ways: collision with wind turbines, collision with associated meteorological towers, collision with, or electrocution by, associated electrical power facilities, and nest abandonment or behavior avoidance from habitat modification.
    http://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/utility-company-sentenced-wyoming-killing-protected-birds-wind-projects-0

    A recent study by federal and state scientists found that U.S. wind turbines could kill up to 1.4 million birds of all species per year by 2030 as the wind energy industry continues to expand. http://www.ibtimes.com/should-wind-turbines-be-allowed-kill-eagles-debate-ratchets-bird-group-lawsuit-1607240

    “I estimated 888,000 bat and 573,000 bird fatalities/year (including 83,000 raptor fatalities) at 51,630 megawatt (MW) of installed wind-energy capacity in the United States in 2012,” writes K. Shawn Smallwood, author of the study that was published in the Wildlife Society Bulletin. http://dailycaller.com/2015/04/20/wind-turbines-kill-more-birds-than-bp-oil-spill/

    Kay Armstrong, who lives near a wind farm in Ontario, Canada, has reported that her home is now “virtually uninhabitable” due to the infrasound from the turbines disturbing her sleep and making her feel dizzy. She also says that local deer are agitated and awake all night, that birds are flying around all day rather than going to roost, and that seals in the area are suffering miscarriages. http://www.breitbart.com/Breitbart-London/2014/06/13/More-Deaths-Linked-to-Wind-Turbines-near-Danish-Mink-Farm —non raptor issues too two people die from explosion at wind turbine: http://www.nieuws.nl/algemeen/20131030/Brand-windmolen-Verlies-collegas-hartverscheurend airplane safety concerns http://blackburnnews.com/chatham/chatham-news/2014/07/06/wind-turbines-near-airport-ordered-removed/ —-ca

    There are currently more than 4,000 turbines by the Altamont Pass. http://sanfrancisco.cbslocal.com/2014/05/23/new-design-may-reduce-bird-deaths-in-wind-turbines-on-altamont-pass-livermore-interstate-580-golden-eagle-animals-environment-renewable-energy/

    Wind turbines at Altamont Pass kill an estimated 880 to 1,300 birds of prey each year, including up to 116 golden eagles, 300 red-tailed hawks, 380 burrowing owls, and additional hundreds of other raptors including kestrels, falcons, vultures, and other owl species. The APWRA is an ecological sink for golden eagles and other raptor species and may be having significant impacts on populations of birds that are rare and reproduce infrequently. http://www.goldengateaudubon.org/conservation/birds-at-risk/avian-mortality-at-altamont-pass/

    “Last June, the Los Angeles Times reported that about 70 golden eagles are being killed per year by the wind turbines at Altamont Pass, about 20 miles east of Oakland, Calif. A 2008 study funded by the Alameda County Community Development Agency estimated that about 2,400 raptors, including burrowing owls, American kestrels, and red-tailed hawks—as well as about 7,500 other birds, nearly all of which are protected under the Migratory Bird Treaty Act—are being killed every year by the turbines at Altamont.”

    http://www.theblaze.com/stories/wind-energy-under-attack-for-thousands-of-wildlife-deaths/

    Most of the bats die because their lungs collapse when they run into low air pressure around the tips of the wind turbines — not because they hit the towers or blades. https://stopthesethings.com/2015/01/09/green-backed-bat-slaughter-hits-alberta-wind-turbines-turning-bats-lungs-to-mush/

    —nj Near Atlantic City NJ 5 industrial wind turbines were erected which are killing an average of 76 birds and bats per year per turbine(not the 1-2 that AWEA and US Fish and Wildlife publicize). This has been documented by the local Audubon society. Though to make sure not too information is known…they only study for 2 years after installation then after that….It is a shameful secret! These killed a Peregrine Falcon of which there are only 25 breeding pair in the entire state, also numerous Osprey, a Green Heron, a Dunlin and many others….is not worth it for these highly variable power producers which require full CO2 emitting backup and power shadowing. Money would be much better spent on conservation and efficiency…which have been shown to be ten times more cost effective thereby doing more for our planet

    http://www.ceoe.udel.edu/lewesturbine/documents/acua_quarterlyreport_fall09.pdf

    http://www.njcleanenergy.com/files/file/Renewable_Programs/Wind/ACUA_Interim%20Report_Jan-Sep08_all.pdf

    —-mo

    The project proposed by Wind Capital Group of St. Louis would erect 94 wind turbines on 8,400 acres that the Osage Nation says contains key eagle-nesting habitat and migratory routes. http://bdnews24.com/environment/2013/06/15/native-americans-decry-eagle-deaths

    st louis mayor’s office: Phone: (314) 622-3201

    Hours: 8 AM – 6 PM Monday through Friday

    Address: 1200 Market , City Hall, Room 200 St. Louis, Missouri 63103

    governor:

    facebook https://www.facebook.com/pages/Jay-Nixon/6517667731

    governors twitter https://twitter.com/GovJayNixon

    2007: NRC Report on Environmental Impact of Wind Farms

    “Collisions with buildings kill 97 to 976 million birds annually; collisions with high-tension lines kill at least 130 million birds, perhaps more than one billion; collisions with communications towers kill between 4 and 5 million based on “conservative estimates,” but could be as high as 50 million; cars may kill 80 million birds per year; and collisions with wind turbines killed an estimated at 20,000 to 37,000 birds per year in 2003, with all but 9,200 of those deaths occurring in California. Toxic chemicals, including pesticides, kill more than 72 million birds each year, while domestic cats are estimated to kill hundreds of millions of songbirds and other species each year. Erickson et al. (2005) estimate that total cumulative bird mortality in the United States “may easily approach 1 billion birds per year.” ” http://www.vawind.org/assets/nrc/nrc_wind_report_050307.pdf

    —— http://www.senate.gov/general/contact_information/senators_cfm.cfm?State=OR

    Merkley, Jeff – (D – OR) Class II 313 HART SENATE OFFICE BUILDING WASHINGTON DC 20510 (202) 224-3753 Web Form: http://www.merkley.senate.gov/contact/

    Wyden, Ron – (D – OR) Class III 223 DIRKSEN SENATE OFFICE BUILDING WASHINGTON DC 20510 (202) 224-5244 Web Form: http://www.wyden.senate.gov/contact/

    —– http://www.leg.state.or.us/senate/members.htm The Oregon State Capitol Address is: 900 Court St. NE, Salem, Oregon 97301. View a map to the Oregon State Capitol. For information regarding the legislative process, email the Legislative Liaison, or call 503-986-1000. For technical questions about this site, please email Oregon Legislative Information Systems, or call 503-986-1914.

    ———- In Spain, the Spanish Ornithological Society (TSOS) estimates that the country’s 18,000 wind turbines cause between six and eighteen million bird deaths a year. This works out at an average of 333 to 1,000 birds per turbine. http://www.breitbart.com/Breitbart-London/2014/06/20/RSPB-Condemns-Plans-to-Build-Huge-Wind-Farm-Near-Rare-Bird-Breeding-Area

    http://articles.latimes.com/2011/jun/06/local/la-me-adv-wind-eagles-20110606

  3. In the US, wind farms can apply for a “take” permit so they can legally kill a certain number of eagles per year.

    http://nawindpower.com/fws-issues-landmark-eagle-take-permit-what-does-it-mean-for-wind-projects

    Which is an admission by their Fish and Wildlife Service that wind turbines do kill birds.

  4. This is no bs. Wind farm jobs include collecting and burying the bodies of birds and bats that get chopped up by the blades. Descriptions of the pits filled with feathers and gory bodies are sickening.

  5. Reblogged this on Climatism and commented:
    Birds covered in oil, gasping and dying from disasters like Exxon Valdez are rare yet are plastered across the media with understandable shock and horror.

    Rare birds and bats are being slaughtered by the hundreds and thousands *everyday* by Industrial Wind Turbines, yet we hear little to nothing on mainstream media, or from green groups.

    Where’s the outrage?

    Green hypocrisy at its ugliest and most sinister.

  6. THE ALIENS HAVE LANDED.

    Imposing in there hundreds,
    Such an army on display,
    Those alien grey metal monsters
    I saw while on my way.
    Aliens on our shores have landed,
    So tall, backs straight and true,
    At night they watch through flashing eyes
    Of red, at me and you.

    Some have scaled the mountains,
    Others near schools and homes,
    Of one thing I am certain,
    Those aliens have no souls.
    No “whispering” from their ranks at all,
    An unearthly sound they make,
    It envelops each and everyone,
    No more can humans take.

    Three giant arms revolving,
    Enveloping all around,
    They’re here to ‘save the planet’,
    The biggest “con” I have found.
    Such hideous tall grey monsters,
    Invade green and pleasant lands,
    To stay for generations,
    Unless the people make a stand.

    These aliens feed on power and wind,
    Without either, they will die,
    They’re NOT environmental friendly,
    They’re for profit, (at a cost), that’s WHY.

  7. Wind farm developers are developers, not their brother’s keeper. They develop according to the parameters provided by the law. The law allows for the avian slaughter. Unless more people stand up for the protection of birds from these monsters, we will be looking at them in books and photos and paintings and wondering why we let it happen. Please keep painting Humph.

  8. 4TimesAYear says:

    Reblogged this on 4timesayear's Blog.

  9. Can anyone tell me if the legislation that facilitates the installation of these cruciform killing machines requires the owner/operators to capture and record data on instances of avian death in the vicinity of the turbines and then to provide regular statistical reports of this (dates, numbers, species, etc) to some government authority in Australia? Or is it just a free-for-all?

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: