The More People Learn About Wind Power – The More They Hate It!

Ontario april-28-protest-rally-3

It doesn’t take long ….


Remember all those glowing stories about wind power outfits being welcomed into rural communities with open arms? You know, tales about how farmers are dying to have turbines lined up all over their properties? How locals can’t wait to pick up some of the thousands of permanent, high paying jobs on offer? How developers are viewed with the kind of reverence reserved for Royalty?


We’ve forgotten them too.

It’s ‘outrage’ that’s become the order of the day. With the wind industry facing growing and increasingly hostile hordes, their teams of community ‘liaison’ officers have taken to literally thumping their message home, setting the muscle on to old-age pensioners and disabled farmers:

Wind Industry Belting its ‘Message’ Home: Trustpower’s Thugs Assault 79-Year-Old Pensioner & Disabled Farmer

And middle-aged women:

Wind Industry Goons Beating Up On Women, as Furious Community Defenders Shoot Up Turbines (Again)

It’s a sure sign that the wind industry’s ‘game’ is lost.

Pro-(real)farming, pro-family, pro-community and pro-(real)power groups have an air of ascendancy now; they’re angry, they’re organised, and they aren’t about to be taken for fools any longer.

Vermonters provide just the latest example of a solid block of united people fighting back against the greatest economic and environmental fraud of all time.

In an earlier post – Democracy in Action: Vermonters Vent Fury at Planned Wind Power Project – we covered one vote where “out of 285 voters, 274 said “NO” to wind development in their town.”

In the latest vote, 83% of another nearby community voted against having to endure sleep-killing, incessant turbine generated low-frequency noise and infrasound and having their property values slashed by more than half:

‘Democracy’ in Jackboots: Wind Industry’s Government Stooges Threaten to Ignore 83% Vote Against Wind Power

Now, here’s a similar tale: this time from upstate New York.

Once in favor of wind power, Yates residents become overwhelmingly opposed
The Buffalo News
Thomas J. Prohaska
10 January 2016

YATES – Residents of this Orleans County town used to be big supporters of wind power, even urging town leaders to go out and recruit a wind developer.

That’s not true anymore.

Two surveys last fall showed overwhelming opposition to the Lighthouse Wind project proposed by Apex Clean Energy, which wants to erect a total of as many as 70 wind turbines in Yates and the neighboring Town of Somerset in Niagara County. The exact number and location of the turbines has not yet been determined, a company spokesman said last week.

Somerset town leaders have been vocal in their opposition to the project, hiring former state Attorney General Dennis C. Vacco to provide legal muscle for their fight against the plan.

Yates leaders responded to the plan more quietly, with the result that some of them aren’t in office anymore.

James J. Simon, running for supervisor on an anti-wind power platform, won the seat as a write-in candidate after losing to incumbent John B. Belson by seven votes in the Republican primary. Yates voters also elected John B. Riggi, president of the anti-wind group Save Ontario Shores, to the Town Board.

The citizens group Save Ontario Shores mailed a survey to Yates property owners last fall, and the results showed 77 percent opposition to the Apex project.

The town then mailed out its own survey, targeting all registered voters as well as property owners. The result, announced just before Christmas, was 65 percent opposition to Lighthouse Wind.

The company viewed the smaller percentage of opponents in the town survey as encouraging. Dahvi Wilson, Apex senior manager of public affairs, said, “We believe the results of this survey demonstrate what we have found over time. When people have a chance to learn the facts about the project, rather than being forced to rely on the misinformation being pushed by opponents, they become more supportive of Lighthouse Wind and what it means for this community.”

But Simon had a different view of the results. “By sending out to registered voters as well as property owners, we cast a much wider net,” he said.

He noted that there was some objection to sending out 2,608 surveys when the town’s population is only about 2,500. By including all property owners, it meant that out-of-towners, even some out-of-staters, were able to weigh in. In all, 1,187 surveys were mailed back.

The Yates figures jibe closely with a Somerset survey conducted last spring by that town’s government, which showed opposition as high as 67 percent, depending on how the question was phrased. Its survey went to all property owners, and 56 percent of them responded.

Simon called it a “curious thing” that when Yates conducted a wind power survey in 2007, at a time when there was no actual project pending, 87 percent of households said they agreed with this statement: “The town should encourage wind energy facilities to locate in the Town of Yates.”

The 2007 survey also showed 89 percent of Yates residents supported tax breaks for wind power companies. Last month’s survey showed that 57 percent opposed a tax break for Lighthouse Wind.

So what happened to turn the results almost completely around eight years later?

Simon said, “The public’s more informed, more concerned. Everybody can Google everything. People have become more educated and are more opposed to wind power.”

Wilson of Apex said, “Until our application is submitted in summer 2016, it is impossible to fully judge the project on its merits. The Yates Town Board has taken a very responsible approach in waiting to take a position until all of the relevant information has been collected and submitted as part of the application process, and we encourage others to follow its lead.”
The Buffalo News

James Simon hits the target in defining the awakening that leads to inevitable opposition, if not gun-toting hostility (see our post here), when he says:

“The public’s more informed, more concerned. Everybody can Google everything. People have become more educated and are more opposed to wind power.”

STT has said it before and we’ll keep saying it.

Once reasonable people are introduced to the facts about the insane costs of intermittent and unreliable wind power they cease to support it.

When they learn of the senseless slaughter of millions of birds and bats, and the tragic suffering caused to hard working rural people by giant industrial wind turbines, reasonable people start to bristle.

But, when they learn that – contrary to the ONLY “justification” for the $billions filched from power consumer and taxpayers and directed as perpetual subsidies to wind power outfits – wind power INCREASES CO2 emissions in the electricity sector – rather than decreasing them, as claimed – their attitude stiffens to the point of hostility to those behind the fraud and those hell-bent on sustaining it.

In our travels we’ve met plenty of people that started out in favour of wind power and turned against it. But we’ve yet to meet anyone who started out opposed to wind power, who later became a supporter. Funny about that.

eagle short-toed

Pro-farming, pro-community and pro-real power groups are better informed and organised, and more vocal and hostile, than ever before.

Hard-working, decent, rural people throughout the world are fighting back – to obtain sensible energy policies that support growth, development and vibrant, prosperous rural communities.

These are entirely reasonable people who have tumbled to the fact that they have been lined up as “road-kill” by their political betters to suffer the consequences of a policy built around an insanely expensive, utterly unreliable, intermittent power source – that can only survive on a raft of massive subsidies; kills millions of birds and bats; destroys communities; drives people from their homes; and otherwise makes life misery for thousands around the world.

These people are out to smash a “policy” that – in a few years time, when it all inevitably collapses – will be revealed for what it is: an enormous government-backed Ponzi scheme, the foundations for which are greed and stupidity; and the “justification” for which can only be described as a circus of the bizarre.

As time goes by, their seething, angry numbers can only increase.


About stopthesethings

We are a group of citizens concerned about the rapid spread of industrial wind power generation installations across Australia.


  1. Wind turbines make the communities that they are placed in uninhabitable. They make homes worthless. They are promoted by degenerates, period!

  2. A small, but meaningful request for my highly-revered friends at Stop These Things…

    Instead of repeating the oxymoronic phrase “Wind Power” in the titles of your otherwise excellent posts, may I humbly suggest that it is more accurately referred to as “Wind Energy,” since – as Kent Hawkins accurately stated, “Wind is NOT Power At All.” See:

    Wind is NOT Power At All:

    Oxymoronic Windpower:

    • Dear Mary, we note your request but respectfully disagree. The terms ‘power’ and ‘energy’ have distinct meanings and we are not about to confuse or conflate them.

      ‘Energy’ is most certainly ‘available’ from the wind (and from the Sun too). But it’s ‘power’ that makes the kettle boil and lights and heats our homes and runs our factories and businesses.

      ‘Energy’ is notional and, unless capable of cost-effective conversion to ‘power’, is meaningless.

      STT does not criticise the fact of ‘energy’ from any source, but attacks the wind industry and its claims that wind ‘energy’ is a useful ‘power’ source. There is no doubt that wind holds ‘energy’, what we point out is that that fact is not enough. Without the ability to dispatch power from an energy source – as and when required (whatever it might be) that power is of no commercial value.

      We deliberately avoid using the term ‘energy’ for a couple of reasons. First, it’s a term used by wind-cultists as a propaganda tool (who could sensibly deny the benefit of free ‘energy’, right?); and, as noted above, until energy is converted to power, it has no benefit to human society at all; you may as well be talking about the power of moonbeams and pixie dust.

      Our mission is to destroy an industry that claims to provide meaningful and cost-competitive power. And it’s that term that we’ll continue to use in furtherance of that mission. Thanks for your comments.


    Imposing in there hundreds,
    Such an army on display,
    Those alien grey metal monsters
    I saw while on my way.
    Aliens on our shores have landed,
    So tall, backs straight and true,
    At night they watch through flashing eyes
    Of red, at me and you.

    Some have scaled the mountains,
    Others near schools and homes,
    Of one thing I am certain,
    Those aliens have no souls.
    No “whispering” from their ranks at all,
    An unearthly sound they make,
    It envelops each and everyone,
    No more can humans take.

    Three giant arms revolving,
    Enveloping all around,
    They’re here to ‘save the planet’,
    The biggest “con” I have found.
    Such hideous tall grey monsters,
    Invade green and pleasant lands,
    To stay for generations,
    Unless the people make a stand.

    These aliens feed on power and wind,
    Without either, they will die,
    They’re NOT environmental friendly,
    They’re for profit, (at a cost), that’s WHY.

  4. William Gray says:

    I find it interesting that when the reality of an impending wind turbine development draws closer the once fooled are very quick to do their homework and discover facts for themselves which is of course a good thing. In this case it was not hard to convince people that they had been fooled unlike the inner city greens who know full well that it will never happen to them. Fortunately things are starting to sink in for more and more people. Thank goodness for the WWW.
    Everyone should give thanks to STT for its tenacity in exposing this farce.

  5. No Turbines says:

    It’s true. The only supporters of wind have either not properly investigated the situation or have a vested interest (or both!). Thanks STT. Keep them coming!

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: