The renewable energy debacle in Germany means that it won’t axe its nuclear plants and is likely to start building more of them, like their French neighbours.
The French, of course, set the benchmark for generating clean, safe and reliable nuclear power; they’ve been doing so for nearly 60 years and still get over 75% of their electricity from their nuclear plants, and export large volumes of what they generate to power starved Germans and Brits.
Meanwhile, Australia sits as the only G20 Nation to not employ nuclear power. With the power pricing and supply catastrophe out in Europe, Australia’s legislated ban on nuclear power looks positively insane.
Australia holds the world’s largest uranium reserves and, despite its shifting policy of limiting the number of mines and states that have banned them, is the world’s third-largest uranium exporter. Happy to export it, but too dim to use it ourselves.
That Australia, among the world’s largest uranium exporters, doesn’t rely on nuclear power astonishes those from the 30 countries where you’ll find nearly 450 nuclear reactors currently operating – including the French, Americans, Canadians, Japanese and Chinese. Another 15 countries are currently building 60 reactors among them. Nuclear power output accounts for over 11% of global electricity production. But not a lick of it in Australia.
In 1998, the Federal government enacted legislation that prohibits nuclear power generation in any form. The Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act and the Australian Radiation Protection and Nuclear Safety Act, specifically prohibit nuclear fuel fabrication, power, enrichment or reprocessing facilities.
The article below was drawn by Queensland Nationals Senator, Matt Canavan – who is one of this country’s best advocates for nuclear power. But, as Matt explains, with everything on its side, nuclear power hardly needs an advocate, at all.
Australia left out in the cold in nuclear renaissance
The Australian
Matt Canavan
4 October 2022
Many would not know there is a nuclear reactor just 30km from Sydney’s CBD. The Lucas Heights nuclear reactor does not produce electricity but medicines, which one in every two Australians will need during their lifetime.
Ironically, it is also the reason Australia maintains a unique ban on nuclear energy. In 1998, the Howard government needed to pass legislation to rebuild the Lucas Heights reactor. To get the bill through the Senate, the government agreed to a Labor and Greens amendment to ban nuclear energy. The debate in the Senate on the nuclear ban idea took fewer than 30 minutes.
In the 1990s, Australia had a young fleet of coal-fired power stations and banning nuclear appeared an easy concession to make. Now Australia is left as the only large rich nation to have a ban on nuclear energy and we are at risk of being left behind.
Nuclear energy is going through a renaissance. France has plans to build 14 nuclear plants, Britain wants to build one every year, and the development of small modular reactors promises lower costs and easier waste solutions.
Even without these developments, Australia’s ban makes no sense. We should prohibit an energy alternative only if it is unsafe or would do significant harm to our environment. Nuclear energy is safe and it would be good for the environment.
According to the website Our World in Data, nuclear energy has the second lowest fatalities per unit of electricity produced, even lower than wind energy and only slightly higher than solar energy.
Nuclear is much safer than the use and transportation of flammable fuels such as coal, gas or hydrogen. Nuclear is the most green form of modern energy because it produces an enormous amount of energy from small amounts.
Canadian economic analyst Vaclav Smil, in his book Power Density: A Key to Understanding Energy Sources and Uses (MIT Press), writes that a single Coke can of uranium can provide you enough energy for your whole life.
Data from Forestry and Land Scotland shows that 14 million trees have been cut down to make way for wind turbines in Scotland. Nuclear energy takes up 300 times less land than wind and 60 times less land than solar. And rare bird species do not get chopped up by nuclear fuel rods.
The world has managed nuclear waste with no incident for more than 60 years. Australia houses nuclear waste from Lucas Heights in a shed within metres of high-priced suburban homes.
Why do our environmental laws ban nuclear energy but subsidise much more environmentally destructive forms such as wind and solar?
The opponents of nuclear energy have given up claiming that nuclear is unsafe. Climate Change and Energy Minister Chris Bowen’s argument against nuclear is now that it is too expensive. Even if that were true, our politicians should not be in charge of deciding what investments are profitable; that should be left to business. Our laws should focus on protecting the public good, not judging private decisions.
That is why eight other senators and I moved legislation in the Senate last week to overturn Australia’s ban on nuclear energy. Our legislation would leave the nuclear trigger in our environmental laws, meaning that any nuclear power proposal would still need the approval of the environment minster. It is the largest support for the legalisation of nuclear energy since the ban was introduced 24 years ago.
We cannot afford to wait any longer because the investments other countries are making in nuclear will bring down the cost of nuclear energy.
But we will not be able to take advantage of such developments unless we embark on the decade-long journey of building a functioning nuclear industry today.
Australia is on track to decriminalise marijuana before we decriminalise nuclear energy.
For those who continue to complain about the cost of nuclear, it must be asked: compared with what? Europe’s green energy nightmare shows without doubt that the Labor government’s obsession with renewable energy cannot deliver cheaper power prices or an industrial economy.
If we do not remove our out-of-step nuclear ban, we risk Australian families permanently paying higher energy bills and losing our manufacturing industry.
Nuclear is a proven, safe technology. What may have seemed a cheap, parliamentary concession to make in the 1990s risks turning into a catastrophic decision a generation later. It is time to overturn this tawdry, parliamentary trade-off and re-establish common sense on energy policy by legalising nuclear reactors, not just for medicines but energy too.
The Australian
About stopthesethings
STOP THESE THINGS 
Holy Roman Empire recognised Germany as the European crossroad where a lot of problems started: Gutenberg’s bible, WWI prelude to WWII (Hitler put in autobahns based on the Roman all weather road) consolidating the private financial money supply & guaranteed governments’ debt that’s now over the moon; the pandemic couldn’t have been better planned so obviously, it wasn’t done by politicians only implemented by them: There’s something very wrong about such a lack of accountability for doing wrong & causing years of suffering for others while hanging on to their guaranteed superannuation.
It’s so odd that not a single educational institution sees anything wrong with parliamentary Question Time. Should children be allowed to behave like that – Aw shucks! Youth crime is rising, international porn is rife, the higher up the ruling ladder the lighter the slap on the wrist. Doesn’t seem right, who is responsible for all this?
We keep going round in circles as the rich keep getting richer, & obviously not learning from European & Germany’s obvious historical continuing mistakes. Subsidies against the Butter Mountain & Milk Lake should have rung warning bells. Instead it set an income stream example; the end of free market forces, beginning of dictated rising prices of life support systems.
Snowball coming down the hill come rain, hail, shine or drought – the only way is up.
AU’s ban on nuclear power looks insane? Well golly gosh, exporting uranium & making nuclear isotopes (had one, Howard now supports nuclear (pity they don’t come to their senses until too late)) means it is insane. But that’s a political decision.
Looks like Janet Holmes à Court no longer dislikes the big horrible wind turbines in her Tassie fishing spot. Now having praised son Simon & teals apparent support for putting more of those things up; well in someone else’s back yard.
Big dams harm the environment! Where do teals stand; more useless turbines; other than they paid for their election.
Someone’s been smoking the green weed; why do they call it dope man?
Now there’s a thought for the QLD Premier; when building the future Olympic stadiums integrate wind turbines in the support structures.
Uh, Oh, silly ideas get adopted!
Quos vult perdere, prius dementat.
Reblogged this on Calculus of Decay .
Reblogged this on whatyareckon and commented:
Wish Australian politicians understood this!
If you set aside the unlicensed and inherently unsafe Chernobyl reactor, which was built in a country with neither safety culture nor licensing criteria, nuclear power is safer than Teddy Kennedy’s car. Contrary to activists claims, the official death toll from the Chernobyl fire was 28. More people have been killed by EV battery fires in the last two years.
Nuclear power is artificially expensive because that’s what activists want. During the first 32 GWe of worldwide deployment, overnight construction costs fell from $US 8 per watt to $US 1 per watt in constant 2007 dollars. Then the US Nuclear Regulatory Commission got spun off from the US Atomic Energy Commission, and staffed with lawyers, architects, gynecologists, and theologians — not one single engineer or scientist. Hostility to nuclear power was institutionalized. Then prices increased, in a maturing technology, which has never happened anywhere else.
Read Merchants Of Despair, by PhD nuclear engineer Robert Zubrin for a fuller explanation of the safety of nuclear power. Book exposes the global warming/climate change fraud & outlines the Nazi origins of the “environmental” movement.
John Doran.
There is a crisis in the French nuclear sector that should be better-known.
“Around half of France’s atomic fleet, the largest in Europe, has been taken offline as a storm of unexpected problems swirls around the nation’s state-backed nuclear power operator, Électricité de France, or EDF.”
I wonder if this has come about from the period when France unbelievably turned green and wanted to plant windmills, maybe they neglected the maintenance of the nuclear fleet.
Your surmise about the reason for France’s neglect of its nuclear plant is exactly correct.
It comes down to a question of lack of will, brought about by the denuclearisation fantasy, one of the fashionable ideological obsessions associated with the net zero fantasy. This interview sheds light on the scale of the current French nuclear malaise:
https://robertbryce.com/episode/alexander-stahel-cio-of-switzerland-based-burggraben-holding-ag/
Thanks Bon!
In case you were wondering why we have no nuclear power in Australia, check out the story of the international campaign that morphed out of the Ban the Bomb protests of the 1950s.
http://www.the-rathouse.com/2011/Grover-Power.html
All the leftwing unions got into the act including the NSW Teachers Federation and teachers distributed anti-nuclear propaganda in the classrooms at the height of the campaign.