Climate Short-Changed: Big Calm Heralds Britain’s Renewable Energy Crunch

Appears the climate doomsayers were right: the ‘Big Calm’ has struck Britain and Western Europe – slashing wind power output, without relent. Far from being the panacea for a changing climate, wind power generation is now, apparently, a victim.

Over the last few months, wind power output has thoroughly collapsed in Germany, across Western Europe and, in particular, in Britain. And it’s all down to the weather.

Who would have thought that a change in the weather could detrimentally affect the output from an entirely weather-dependent power source?

It’s as if there’s some sinister plot being cooked up by the owners of coal-fired power plants – the ones that have been urgently pressed back into service in both Germany and in the UK.

In the – don’t say we didn’t warn you – piece below, Francis Menton explains how the Big Calm has rattled those still believing in our ‘inevitable transition’ to an all wind and sun-powered future.

Renewable Energy Crunch Comes To The UK
Manhattan Contrarian
Francis Menton
20 September 2021

Anybody who looks with a critical eye at the madcap push toward increasing amounts of intermittent renewable electricity generation in the U.S. and Europe quickly realizes that eventually this has to hit a wall. But when will the crunch come? Theoretically, with 100% fossil fuel backup you can keep an electricity system of majority renewables functioning indefinitely, albeit with consumers bearing the unnecessary costs of two fully redundant generating systems. But then politicians pledge to reduce and then eliminate the fossil fuel backup, and by dates that are rapidly approaching. Backup plants get closed and decommissioned. For how much longer can this really keep going?

I have written about this subject several times (for example here in June 2020, and here in July 2021); but, not wanting to sound like the boy who cried wolf, I don’t just keep harping on it every day. Better to wait for the inevitable crunch to actually hit somewhere.

In just the past few days, an early version of the crunch has begun to hit the UK. Unfortunately for the Brits, this is happening on the very eve of their big “climate summit,” sometimes going by the name COP26, set to kick off in Glasgow on November 1. Likely, you have not read about the UK energy crunch, because the last thing that mainstream US news sources are going to devote their space to is information on how jurisdictions that have been the most enthusiastic in adopting intermittent electricity generation are starting to run into major problems. To get real information, an excellent place to start is the several-times-weekly email from the (London-based) Global Warming Policy Foundation, which provides summaries and links to articles in the UK and other European press.

First, some background on how the UK got themselves to where they are. Like all the European countries, the UK has been in the thrall of climate hysteria for at least a couple of decades. Some had hopes that Boris Johnson, who had previously made some skeptical noises, would bring a dose of sanity when he became Prime Minister in 2019; but instead he has gone after the climate dragon with all the zeal of a new convert. The UK’s statutory commitment to reach “net zero” carbon emissions by 2050 was enacted right at the time that Johnson was taking over the Prime Ministership from Theresa May.

According to Reuters here, peak electricity demand in Great Britain is about 30 GW in the summer and 50 GW in the winter. (Not much need for air conditioning over there!) To see how well they cover that peak demand, we can look to the Digest of UK Energy Statistics, of which the 2020 version just came out on July 29, 2021. Here is their chart of available resources, which appeared on page 88 of that Report:

As you can see, as recently as 2010, they had a very comfortable 80+ GW of dispatchable generation capacity of various sorts — CCGT (i.e, natural gas), “conventional steam” (i.e., coal), nuclear, and hydro. But in that year they started to reduce the amounts of all of those except the natural gas. Today they’re down to about 55 GW total of dispatchable capacity, with coal reduced from about 40 GW to about 15, and natural gas up somewhat from about 20 GW to about 30 GW.

So looking at this you would think at first glance that it is still too soon for the crunch to hit. But look a little closer. You can also see from the chart that with the reduction in coal capacity, natural gas is now critical to the backup equation, and without the natural gas backup, the coal, nuclear and hydro by themselves are not going to be sufficient when the wind and sun go to zero, as they regularly do. And in the UK, even though they are sitting on top of a perfectly good natural gas shale formation, they have managed effectively to ban fracking. To get full background on how that occurred, you can read Matt Ridley’s 2019 article here. (Basically, the ban arose from regulators accepting environmentalist claims that fracking would cause earthquakes. At this point, all frackers in the UK have given up.) Meanwhile, gas output from the North Sea fields is in serious decline. So when the wind and sun don’t produce, the UK is now completely dependent on natural gas from other countries to provide the fossil fuel backup for its weather-dependent renewable generation.

And then, in the last few weeks, the wind in the supposedly-always-windy North Sea has suddenly gone quiet. From Fortune, September 16:

The exponential growth of offshore wind farms in the North Sea has been a testament to the combined efforts of European countries’ investing time, effort, and money in the decarbonization of their electricity grids. But just as Europe needs energy the most, the wind in the North Sea has stopped blowing. . . .

So all of a sudden everybody in Europe needed to crank up their remaining natural gas capacity to 100%, all at the same time, and with essentially no domestic supplies. Needless to say, prices spiked and supply shortages immediately emerged. Wholesale gas prices are up by about 70% over the past month, and again today, Bloomberg reported a 10% spike in gas prices in just the one day, as “Russia [is keeping] a firm grip on supply.” And the crunch is particurly acute in the UK. The Daily Mail reported today that as a result of the huge wholesale gas price increases, dozens of utilities suddenly face bankruptcy unless they can either raise consumer prices immediately or get a prompt bailout from the government:

Taxpayers could be hit with a multibillion-pound bill as energy bosses try to ease soaring fuel costs which is leaving suppliers on the brink of collapse. Ministers are in talks with energy companies over a bailout that could help the beleaguered sector – which has seen wholesale gas prices increase by 70 per cent since last month.

Collateral consequences are rapidly spreading through the economy. From the Global Warming Policy Foundation, September 18:

As energy prices in Europe go through the roof, factories are beginning to shut down and food is disappearing from the shelves. . . . Acute food shortages were feared last night after high gas prices forced most of Britain’s commercial production of carbon dioxide to shut down. Emergency talks were being held between government officials and food producers, retailers and the energy industry with warnings of a “black swan event”, an extremely rare blow with unpredictable consequences. The closure of two fertiliser plants in northern England and others in Europe has left the food and drink industry facing a shortage of carbon dioxide, which is a byproduct of fertiliser manufacturing. The gas is critical to the production and transport of a range of products, from meat to bread, beer and fizzy drinks.

And what will be the consequences as the wholesale price spikes work their way through to the consumer? From the Daily Mail, September 18:

A cost of living crisis will see average households’ bills soar by more than £1,500 a year, experts warn today. Families are now on the cusp of the biggest spending squeeze in nearly a decade as bills and prices rise relentlessly.

That would represent roughly a doubling of the annual average consumer electric bill.

And remember, as of today, they still have full fossil fuel backup for their intermittent wind and solar electricity production. What happens a few years from now when the full backup is gone, and the electricity goes out every time the wind and sun stop working at the same time?

I suspect that the current crisis in the UK will pass over the upcoming weeks or months, as the wind starts blowing again. But the current crisis is just a small foretaste of what will inevitably happen as fossil fuel backup goes away and dependence on intermittent renewables increases. The best is yet to come.
Manhattan Contrarian

About stopthesethings

We are a group of citizens concerned about the rapid spread of industrial wind power generation installations across Australia.


  1. I only hope that the wind drought continues.
    Let the public suffer some short term pain and they might realise just how insane it is to think that relying on unreliable sunshine and breezes is any way to power a grid. Only then will they get off their apathetic backsides and start harassing their government reps.

  2. Steven Rader says:

    We in North Carolina are about to face the very same problems. Our legislature just passed NC’s own Green New Deal, requiring 70% reduction in CO2 by 2030, worse than the EU target of 50%. Those requirements came in Republican Senate leadership’s “committee substitute” on HB951.

  3. ronaldsteinptsadvancecom says:

    Who in their right mind wants to rely on breezes and sunshine for a continuous uninterruptible supply of electricity? Intermittent electricity from breezes and sunshine, has not, and will not, run the economies of the world, as electricity alone is unable to support the prolific growth rates of the medical industry, military, airlines, cruise ships, supertankers, container shipping, and trucking infrastructures to meet the demands of the exploding world population.

    Only healthy and wealthy countries like the USA, Germany, Australia, and the UK can subsidize electricity from breezes and sunshine, and intermittent electricity at best. The 80 percent of the 8 billion on earth living on less than 10 dollars a day cannot subsidize themselves out of a paper bag. Those poorer countries must rely on affordable and abundant coal for reliable electricity, while residents in the healthy and wealthier countries pay dearly for those subsidies with some of the highest cost for electricity in the world.

  4. The UK’s all-time record of 06 December 2020 still stands though!

    38 GW installed capacity of wind and solar power plants (WASPPs) generated at a power level of 0.63 GW for 24 hours.

    £65 billion of capital investment generated 1.8% of UK demand, backed up by an equal capacity of gas and coal fired plants – definitely NOT LOW CARBON.

    £65 billion would finance 3 x Sizewell C nuclear power plants that would generate 24/7/365, LOW CARBON electricity at a power level of 9 GW and supply 21% of the UK’s electricity demand every year, for 60 years.

  5. Rafe Champion says:

    England is an island but they are close enough to other places to have extension cords. What happens when the other places run down their conventional power resources. Check out California.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: