Wind turbine fires ‘ten times more common than thought’, experts warn


C’mon baby, light my fire: spontaneous turbine combustion
happens a whole lot more often than the wind industry lets on.


Wind turbine fires ‘ten times more common than thought’, experts warn
Emily Gosden
The Telegraph
17 July 2014

Study backed by Imperial College finds wind turbines prone to “catastrophic” fires but the true scale of the problem is unknown

Wind turbines may catch on fire ten times more often than is publicly reported, putting nearby properties at risk and casting doubt on their green credentials, researchers have warned.

The renewable energy industry keeps no record of the number of turbine fires, meaning the true extent of the problem is unknown, a study backed by Imperial College London finds on Thursday.

An average of 11.7 such fires are reported globally each year, by media, campaign groups and other publicly-available sources, but this is likely to represent just the “tip of the iceberg”.

There could in fact be 117 turbine fires each year, it argues, based on analysis showing just 10pc of all wind farm accidents are typically reported.

Fires tend to be “catastrophic”, leading to turbines worth more than £2 million each being written off, because the blazes occur so high up that they are almost impossible to put out, it warns.

Turbines are prone to catching on fire because their design puts highly flammable materials such as hydraulic oil and plastic in close proximity to machinery and electrical wires, which can ignite a fire if they overheat or are faulty.

“Lots of oxygen, in the form of high winds, can quickly fan a fire inside a turbine,” it says. “Once ignited, the chances of fighting the blaze are slim due to the height of the wind turbine and the remote locations they are often in.”

It warns: “Under high wind conditions, burning debris from the turbine may fall on nearby vegetation and start forest fires or cause serious damage to property.”

The main causes of fires are lightning strikes, electrical malfunction, mechanical failure, and errors with maintenance, it finds.

The academics used data compiled by the Caithness Windfarm Information Forum (CWIF), an anti-wind lobby group, which records 1,328 accidents involving wind farms globally between 1995 and 2012. Of these, 200 – 15 per cent – involved turbines catching on fire, implying 11.7 fires per year.

But the report, published in the journal Fire Safety Science, also back CWIF’s view that the true number is far higher.

It points out that the wind industry body, Renewable UK, has admitted there were 1,500 wind farm accidents and incidents in the UK alone between 2006 and 2010 – while just 142 individual accidents in the UK were documented in CWIF’s database over the same period.

This implies that less than 10pc of incidents are publicly reported.

Dr Guillermo Rein, of the Department of Mechanical Engineering at Imperial, said: “Fires are a problem for the industry, impacting on energy production, economic output and emitting toxic fumes. This could cast a shadow over the industry’s green credentials. Worryingly our report shows that fire may be a bigger problem than what is currently reported.”

He told the Telegraph he believed it was “the responsibility of the industry” to keep a proper database and believed the industry itself had been “surprised by the magnitude of the problem”.

UK cases highlighted in the report include a 100-metre tall turbine that caught fire during hurricane-force winds at Ardrossan in North Ayrshire in December 2011, reportedly due to a lightning strike. The wind turbine was completely burnt out and debris scattered over large distances due to the strong wind.

In 2005, a turbine at the Nissan factory in Sunderland was engulfed in fire before falling onto a nearby A-road, causing traffic disruption. The blaze was believed to be caused by a loose bolt jamming a mechanism, causing it to overheat.

Dr John Constable, director of Renewable Energy Foundation, which has published research showing that wind turbine performance declines sharply with age, said: “This new study on wind turbine fire hazards is an important reminder that there are hidden operation and maintenance costs affecting the economic lifetime of what is after all very expensive equipment. Just because the wind is free doesn’t mean that it is a cheap way of generating electricity.”

A spokesman for Renewable UK said it did “not have numbers of fires as in many cases these do not need to be formally reported”.

Renewable UK’s director of health and safety, Chris Streatfeild, said: “The wind industry welcomes any research that will help reduce maintenance times and improve safety standards. However, the industry would probably challenge a number of the assumptions that are presented in the research, which include the questionable reliability of the data sources referenced and perhaps more importantly a failure to understand the safety and integrity standards for fire safety that are in effect standard practice in any large wind turbine.”

He said: “Fire is a very important issue for the industry in terms worker and public safety as well in reducing costs through minimising any operational down time. However the operational practices and design standards are such that the actual safety risks associated fire are extremely low. No member of the public has ever been injured by a wind turbine in the UK.”
The Telegraph

About stopthesethings

We are a group of citizens concerned about the rapid spread of industrial wind power generation installations across Australia.


  1. Melissa says:

    The craziest thing, even on high fire danger days when all other equipment is grounded, turbines keep on spinning. Even crazier is seeing a bushfire, flames roaring in the distant background and ash and smoke from the bushfire landing on our property and nearby turbines are still operating. Meanwhile the community attends bushfire emergency meetings for updates and prepares for evacuation. Where are the absentee hosts and operators of the wind farm… absent and uncaring.

  2. Jackie Rovenksy says:

    The Ceres project is one which has many dangers associated with it, fire is a huge concern. The ability to use fire bombers is an extra fire fighting tool which affords an extra level of safety for everyone – the fires in SA only months ago are a prime example of how fire bombers can assist with fighting these fires, as well as assisting ground crews. Those fires went through areas where Turbines are proposed. When will the industry and Governments accept they are an unacceptable risk in an environment so prone to raging bushfire.
    Will it take a tragedy before they listen?
    It should be mandatory for ANY fire in a turbine or any equipment out ‘in the field’ of a Wind Energy Project be reported and recorded by the CFS, only then will they actually take notice of the number of fires there are. Failure to do so should cost them dearly with a massive fine.
    The industry will not tell us of every incident because they know what the reaction will be, and when they have been asked about possibility of failures that could result in a fire, all they say is there is very little chance of it happening and they have people trained to fight fires – of course they have the cranes and equipment to fight a fire 40+ stories up – don’t they?
    The cost of down time for turbines, maintenance and replacement is miniscule to the cost of a life and should be way down the list of concerns with respect to fires in these things.

  3. One of main arguments against the Ceres wind farm, put up by Heartland Farmers, is the risk of fires caused by wind turbines in severe fire weather. We have seen several very serious fires here, when the only way they were slowed down, was by using water bombers, allowing ground crews to get in and stop them. The bombers will not be able to be used in the 18,000 hectare footprint of the Ceres wind farm.

    If a turbine caught fire and started a wild fire on a catastrophic fire weather day, the fire would go straight to the coast and Port Julia, Sheoak Flat and the top half of Port Vincent would be totally burnt out. There is a fair chance that Black Point and Port Julia would be burnt out, when the gusty south west change comes through in the evening, taking the fire back the other way. All of these Communities have very little protection from fire on the western side of them. The water bombers could not help, because the wind farm runs right into the back of Port Vincent, on the coast.

    You would see the same devastation here, as there was at Tulka in 2012 and Dunalley in 2013, the sea will be the only refuge.

    Of course we were scoffed at by the self appointed wind turbine experts, “there have only been three turbine fires in Australia”, they said. Now we find out the chances of a turbine catching fire, have increased ten fold.

    There could very well be a lot more turbine fires in the future, but as usual, no one is listening.

  4. If in the event of a fire that is sparked by a wind turbine, gets out of hand, destroys neighbouring property or injures people or there is stock loss, is that covered by the insurance or the wind turbine host?

    What does the insurance industry have to say about insuring properties hosting industrial wind turbines?

    Will they actually insure them?


  1. […] diese ungeplanten Feuerwerk-Shows (siehe Beitrag hier) haben das Potenzial buchstäblich die Welt in Brand zu setzen. Überhitzung der Lager und Bremsen […]

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: