No Defence: Chaotic Wind & Solar Prime Culprits For Massive Retail Power Price Hikes

The insane cost of the wind and solar ‘transition’ is starting to bite; the wind and sun cult are struggling to shift the blame. While Vlad Putin may be a seriously thuggish dictator, he can’t seriously be held responsible for rocketing power prices in the UK, Europe and Australia, where power prices have been surging northwards for years, and long before the Russians stormed their way across Ukraine.

No, the answer in each case lies much closer to home and rests with the lunacy of attempting to run first world economies on sunshine and breezes.

The Australian’s Nick Cater is, as usual, on the money with this article, albeit that he confuses efficient to operate combined cycle gas turbines with highly inefficient open cycle gas turbines, a minor error that we resolve below.

Labor could pay the ultimate price from electricity shock
The Australian
Nick Cater
30 October 2022

The prospect of presiding over the steepest rise in energy prices since records began should be headache enough for a Prime Minister elected on a promise to cut power bills by $275 a year.

The 56 per cent increase in power prices forecast by Treasury in the next two years will beat the previous high of 47 per cent under Malcolm Fraser between September 1980 and August 1982. Fraser was destined for an ignominious defeat the following year, having presided over one of the highest levels of sustained inflation in Australian history; highest personal taxation levels, historically high interest rates and a growth in business bankruptcies.

Anthony Albanese does not have to read the history books to grasp the political cost of energy inflation. In the first term of the last Labor government in which he served, the retail cost of electricity went up by more than 40 per cent. It increased by another 40 per cent in Labor’s second term, setting the political environment for Tony Abbott’s landslide-winning campaign against Labor’s carbon tax.

Which makes it puzzling that the Albanese government is committed to a pro-renewables energy policy that will further ratchet up the cost of energy.

Labor should be looking for plan B. Perversely, however, Energy Minister Chris Bowen is painting himself into a corner with every smart-alec tweet and every surly press conference he conducts. His arrogant insistence on sticking to a path determined before the exposure of the renewable energy sham in Europe is the biggest threat to Albanese’s chance of a second term.

The Putin-ate-my-homework excuse won’t work for long; neither will Bowen’s flat-earth promise to bring prices down by installing 22,000 solar panels a day and 40 wind turbines a month for the next eight years. Presumably he hasn’t factored in the $20bn the government is about to spend upgrading the grid to facilitate the development of mega wind and solar generators. Nor has he taken note of the soaring price of steel, copper, lithium and other minerals necessary to produce and connect solar, wind and batteries.

Vladimir Putin may be responsible for the invasion of Ukraine, but he had no influence, as far we know, on Daniel Andrews’ moratorium on gas exploration in Victoria. Nor can we blame him for the self-flagellating policies of NSW Energy Minister Matt Kean or the decisions of the courts that have prevented the development of new gas projects.

The growth of gas as a generator of power over the past decade and a half was not driven by market forces. The rush to install quick-start combined-cycle gas turbines was almost entirely driven by the technical shortcomings of weather-dependent renewable generators. The three-figure cost of a megawatt hour at crucial points of the day has nothing to do with corporate greed, as Bowen would have us believe. It has everything to do with reliance on gas caused by the infestation of unstable, unreliable generation technology into the grid.

[Note to Nick: in the para above you refer to “quick-start combined-cycle gas turbines”. If only Australia was using CCGTs, which are far more efficient in terms of their fuel use and output than the ‘quick-start’ Open Cycle Gas Turbines which are, in essence, jet engines. The OCGT burns gas, oil or kerosene and is highly inefficient by comparison with the CCGT. The OCGT vents its exhaust, wasting all of the heat generated:

CCGTs, on the other hand, capture the exhaust gas from the first cycle, which is a turbine with a similar configuration to the OCGT, the difference being is that the exhaust gas is used to heat a boiler, which in turn produces steam used to power another turbine and generate electricity in addition to that from the gas burning turbine. Hence the name “combined cycle”. The heat energy is captured, not wasted and, accordingly, gas is used far more efficiently than in the OCGT. CCGTs are not designed as fast start-up units but, rather, are designed to run for longer periods to obtain the benefit of the heat used to keep a boiler up to steam:

CCGTs are not designed for fast start-ups and shutdowns, which have become the order of the day thanks to the chaotic delivery of wind and solar. No, Nick it’s OCGTs and even gas/diesel fuelled piston engines that are being used to deal with sudden and unpredictable collapses in wind and solar output. Which is the main reason wholesale and retail power prices are increasing at astonishing rates.]

Gas and renewables are inextricably linked. When Labor entered office in 2007, gas provided roughly 10 per of our energy needs. Six years later, gas was generating around 20 per cent of Australia’s electricity. In between, Labor had increased subsidies for wind and solar through the Renewable Energy Target mechanism. The amount of wind and solar in the grid increased 10-fold.

The historical link between the introduction of wind and solar into the mix and rising prices is not unique to Australia.

“In every state in the US and every country in Europe where the share of electricity from wind and solar has increased, it has led to higher-cost electricity for consumers,” Mark Mills of the Manhattan Institute told me in an interview last week.

The injection of renewables on steroids Bowen is proposing “is a really dumb idea”, says Mills. “It requires such massive overbuilding. It has a crushing impact on the economy. The scale of resources required is off the charts and the cost of it is stunning.” The increase in wind, solar and battery capacity needed between now and 2030 is “close to impossible to build that fast”.

The persistence of the narrative of cheap renewables depends on the constant repetition of falsehoods, ignorance of the laws of physics and economic illiteracy. Just as during the Covid-19 scare, narrative determines the selection of data, not the other way round.

On Friday, for example, the Australian Energy Market Operator proclaimed that a new record had been set in the proportion of renewable energy powering the grid. At 12.30pm, 68.7 per cent of demand in the National Energy Market was met with renewables, half of it from rooftop solar panels. The wholesale price of electricity in that moment of sunshine was effectively free.

It takes more effort to discover from the data the surge in the cost of energy four hours later as gas generators kicked in to stabilise supply. The average peak price in NSW on Friday was $144, almost three times as high as the daily average a decade ago.

The ideological fixation with renewable energy fits the pattern of what US social psychologist Rob Henderson labels “luxury beliefs”. Like luxury product brands, luxury beliefs serve as markers of social status. Typically, the cost of such ideas is not felt by those who espouse them most passionately.

The doubling of power bills will be little felt in seats such as Kooyong, where teal independent Monique Ryan wants to accelerate the renewable boom to meet a target of a 60 per cent reduction in emissions in eight years. The richest 20 per cent of households spends as little as 1.5 per cent of their income on electricity, according to research commissioned by the Australian Council of Social Service and the Brotherhood of St Laurence five years ago. Low-income households were spending about 6.4 per cent of their income on energy, up from 5.9 per cent in 2008.

The energy price gap will grow wider still with the renewable-induced increase in costs we are beginning to face.

The pain will be felt disproportionately in the mortgage belt as interest rates rise.

For a Prime Minister who was elected with the lowest primary vote his party has ever recorded, the coming electricity shock could prove fatal.
The Australian

And she votes…

About stopthesethings

We are a group of citizens concerned about the rapid spread of industrial wind power generation installations across Australia.


  1. Peter Pronczak says:

    Unfortunately STT the definition of “first world economies” has never been accurately defined. Unions have been in cahoots with government & business to save them money for many years (if ever not); first hand experience Dept of Defence early 1970s, & knowingly randomly killing employees (asbestos) until 1985 at least.

    Under the current situation, can a fist world country be nominated & under what criteria?

    And as STT knows the BOM has been manipulating records that are MSM presented for emotional manipulation from children up.
    Can’t count, can’t read, can’t think straight – compulsory educated.

  2. Energy myths and realities, Vaclav Smil
    What is the word“energy”?coal,gas,oil are materials. Wind and solar are motion.
    This is a philosophy question.
    Stop metaphysics.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: