Utopian Fantasyland: Wind & Solar ‘Transition’ Total Delusion Being Sold By Total Fools

The West’s obsession with the unreliables, wind and solar was guaranteed to end in tears – the weather-driven power rationing and rocketing power prices were as perfectly predictable, as they were perfectly avoidable.

Every country that has hitched its energy future to sunshine and breezes is facing both a power pricing and supply calamity.

Wind and solar ‘powered’ Germans are being softened up for major energy rationing and further price hikes – bureaucrats are working overtime to come up with new ways of depriving their compatriots of the electricity they once enjoyed like running water. With winter approaching, one cunning plan is to get energy-starved Germans to bunch up in commonly heated exhibition halls to prevent them from freezing to death when temperatures plummet.

In Britain, equally obsessed with subsidised and intermittent wind and solar, power prices are rising at astronomical rates. Last October, the average annual energy bill was £1,400 ($2,400). Energy industry analyst Cornwall Insight forecasts that the British price cap will skyrocket and the average annual bill will reach £3,582 ($6,177) in October. By January, it predicts it will be £5,000 (almost $10,000) a year. The average household will be forced to spend £150 a week by February in an effort to keep their homes lit up and warm, come mid-winter. No doubt Brits will relish the opportunity of having to choose between heating and eating.

And yet, our witless PM, Anthony Albanese and his gormless Energy Minister, Chris Bowen remain utterly determined to destroy what’s left of Australia’s reliable and affordable energy supplies, in precisely the same way. Scott Hargreaves provides some timely insight into the current insanity that passes as energy policy in this Country.

Labor living in cloud cuckoo land on energy policy future
The Australian
Scott Hargreaves
20 August 2022

Affordable and reliable electricity is central to everything Australia does. But in pursuit of a policy of net-zero emissions by 2050, the new federal Labor government has doubled down on policies that will further undermine the reliability and affordability of our electricity supply system.

Labor’s Rewiring the Nation policy boasts that renewables will constitute 82 per cent of the capacity in the National Electricity Market (the NEM, covering everywhere except Western Australia and the Northern Territory) by 2030. Somehow, they say, this will be achieved while also lowering prices.

It has taken decades to get to the current equivalent figure of 39 per cent renewables, yet Labor suggests Australia could more than double this in a little over seven years. Following the lead from Canberra, the Australian Energy Market Operator released its 2022 Integrated System Plan on June 30, with practically the same targets as the government.

In the past 20 years, the focus of federal government policy been on boosting renewable energy sources, especially wind and solar. This has been supplemented by various state-based schemes that underwrite new projects. However, actual costs to consumers have greatly increased, with further double-digit jumps occurring just recently.

While wind and solar have high set-up costs but low operating costs, it is the cost of the required back-up energy and transmission systems that is driving up the cost to consumers. Yet, AEMO’s Step Change scenario calls for a massive expansion of this approach.

Onshore wind capacity would need to increase from 11,525MW in 2023-24 to 34,415MW in 2030-31. This would require approximately 7000 additional wind turbines to be constructed across multiple sites in regional and rural Australia. Likewise, solar power must increase from 30,000MW in 2023-24 to 51,000MW in 2030-31. This will mean the installation of another 100 million solar panels, which will be overwhelmingly bought from China.

There are two principal difficulties with this scenario.

The first is it requires the approval and construction of many more wind and solar projects, and associated transmission lines, in communities that are increasingly hostile to them.

Secondly, every additional unit of renewable energy pushes up the cost of integrating it into the system while maintaining reliability. It is not a case of “the more the merrier”, because its variability requires real time back-up, driving up total system costs.

[Note to Scott: we suggest you extend your second point to make it plain that it does not matter how many wind turbines and solar panels there are connected to Australia’s Eastern Grid. As to wind power output, there are dozens and dozens of occasions each year when the total combined output of all turbines connected to the Eastern Grid is less than 5% of their notional (9,854MW) capacity, and numerous occasions when it is even less than that. Oh, and for the uninitiated, sunset has a rather brutal effect on solar power output, every single day.]

To allow connection of these vast new wind and solar projects, AEMO’s plan calls for $12.7bon to be spent on 10,000km of new transmission networks by 2050.

It identifies a number of transmission projects that need to be completed by 2030, particularly through regional NSW and Victoria and the Marinus interconnector between Tasmania and the mainland.

Transmission lines can be more vulnerable to delays in planning and approvals, even more so than wind and solar projects, and more vulnerable to local opposition, as they span hundreds of kilometres and require wide safety corridors.

In its plan, AEMO airily suggests that to address concerns about “social licence to operate”, developers need to “engage with landholders and regional communities to co-design solutions”. But back in the real world, the Western Renewables Link, in Victoria’s Western District, has encountered serious opposition from local communities.

Likewise, the new interconnector between South Australia and NSW is having to deal with the land access issues where farmers are stridently opposed.

One of the most often overlooked aspects of the federal government’s and AEMO’s plans are that energy systems require engineering and not ideology to function properly.

From an engineering standpoint, each additional renewable energy project reduces system-wide reliability. Companies cannot commercially operate base-load power stations, which need to run for 70–80 per cent of the time, when wholesale power prices are so often negative.

The reason prices are negative is because renewable energy generates spasmodically depending on the vagaries of the weather. This is why wholesale electricity prices increased over 85 per cent when the 1600MW Hazelwood power station in Victoria closed with six months’ notice in 2017.

As coal-fired baseload generation has been under increasing pressure, gas-fired generation has supplied the peak load and covered for renewables when weather conditions take them out of the market. But as Australians have witnessed this winter, exploration and development of gas supplies have not kept up with demand for energy.

It is also of concern that the Albanese government’s move to legislate emission-reduction targets will hand further legal ammunition to activists to use the courts to block new coal and gas projects, further reducing the sources of the only fuels that keep the lights on.

Matters are becoming urgent. The 1680MW Liddell power station in the Hunter Valley is due to close later this year, and consumers can expect a similar impact to that seen when Hazelwood closed.

Next will come the closure of some of our newer and more efficient plants. Origin Energy has announced its intention to close Australia’s largest power station, Eraring, in 2025, which alone provides about 20 per cent of the electricity for NSW.

The centrepiece of the proposed takeover of AGL by billionaire Mike Cannon-Brookes was the early closure of Australia’s other two large baseload power stations: Bayswater in the Hunter Valley and Loy Yang A in Victoria before 2030. In 2020–21, the Liddell, Yallourn, Eraring, Bayswater, and Loy Yang A power stations provided 31 per cent of all electricity produced in the NEM.

The Institute of Public Affairs has modelled the cost to households of forcing the six key coal-fired power stations out of business. Across the five regions of the NEM, households would face average annual energy bill increases of between 95 and 125 per cent, with the average annual bill in NSW rising up to $2600 a year.

Renewable energy supporters suggest batteries and pumped hydro can be the source of back-up power. Yet grid-scale batteries remain small.

If it ran at maximum capacity, the vaunted 150MW battery in South Australia could supply 5 per cent of the state’s peak demand for just one hour. Meanwhile, Snowy 2.0’s cost overruns and lack of answers on transmission capacity is making it a joke. Total projected costs have blown out beyond $12bn.

There are also further challenges to the renewable energy generators’ social licence to operate that AEMO is so often concerned about.

About 90 per cent of solar panels installed in Australia come from China. Polysilicon is a critical part of solar panels, and 45 per cent of global polysilicon comes from the Uighur region in China.

According to a 2021 report by a team at Sheffield Hallam University, all manufacturers of polysilicon in the Uighur region have either used forced labour or been supplied raw materials by companies that have.

There is also the emerging waste problem of how to dispose of old solar panels. [Note to Scott: that will be by crushing and dumping them in landfills, where they will leach their toxic remains into the water table, for generations to come.]

A 2021 article in Harvard Business Review, The Dark Side of Solar Panels, highlighted this issue, noting that “the economics of solar – so bright-seeming from the vantage point of 2021 – would darken quickly as the industry sinks under the weight of its own trash”. The article notes there has also been no serious discussion about the recycling of wind turbine blades.

[Note to Scott: 10-20 tonne turbine blades don’t get ‘recycled’, they get dumped in landfills; millions have already made their one-way trip; often illegally.]

Globally, nuclear energy provides about 10 per cent of all electricity. Australia must at the least have a debate about the costs of net zero alongside the debate we need to have for nuclear power, especially in the context of a world where everything including transport is being electrified.

Germany thought it had a plan when it was retiring both coal and nuclear while building renewables. However, we now know the system only worked at all because of the gas supplied by Russia. As Vladimir Putin turns the tap on and off, there has been a scramble towards something more realistic.

Back in Australia, it would have been better if the former ­Coalition government had not let Scott Morrison succumb to Boris Johnson’s fantasy of a global agreement on net zero. However, we at least now have the opportunity to avoid Europe’s fate through exploring nuclear and prolonging the life of coal-fired power stations.

Proponents of renewable energy raise objections that nuclear will take too long and will require governments to effectively underwrite construction. That is, they demonise nuclear energy for requiring governments to take the same supportive and long-term approach the renewables lobby has been demanding, and enjoying, for decades.

The electricity market was officially suspended for the first time in June and is effectively being nationalised on a command and control model.

When Climate Change and Energy Minister Chris Bowen occasionally hops behind the rhetorical wall of “the market” just to take potshots at nuclear energy, it is proof of his rhetorical agility, but not his credibility.

Despite its title, the government’s Rewiring the Nation is not in fact a plan. A workable plan would not allow reliable capacity to be diminished until a dependable future solution arrives.

Sensible people would not sell their brand new car and commit to driving an unreliable wreck that may or may not start, while waiting a decade for a newer model that may or may not arrive. But that is what Australia is doing.

The modern electricity grid, which has been developed over the past century, provides a remarkably high level of reliable supply. What Australians must face is that it is about to get a whole lot more unreliable. This is not an energy transition, it is a regression.

Scott Hargreaves is the executive director of the Institute of Public Affairs. This is an edited extract of a forthcoming feature article in the IPA Review.
The Australian

Why on Earth would neighbours balk at an opportunity like this?

About stopthesethings

We are a group of citizens concerned about the rapid spread of industrial wind power generation installations across Australia.

Comments

  1. Meanwhile, China has 250 GWe of coal-fired capacity under construction or on the planning docket.

    When Greens say that storage will solve the problem, demand answers to “How much storage?” and “How much will it cost?”

  2. These people are no fools, but the public is. This is green socialism, bringing the west down in the name of Covid, climate change and Ukraine.

  3. “Labor’s Rewiring the Nation policy boasts that renewables will constitute 82 per cent of the capacity in the National Electricity Market…”

    Until the wind stops and the Sun sets, when it produces SFA, and every last milliwatt has to be replaced by some form of supply.
    And no matter what claims are made for batteries etc. that inevitably means fossil fuelled generation.
    End of story.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: