One thing you’ll never, ever hear from wind power outfits is a call to cut the subsidies that sustain them.
Remarkably, whether in Germany, Australia, Ontario or Texas, renewables rent seekers all speak the same language.
When talk turns to subsidies, you’ll only ever hear words like ‘more’. Challenge them about their nonsensical claims that wind power is cheap and truly competitive with coal and gas, they’ll start pleading about not doing away with subsidies, ‘just yet’.
Back in 1983 the American Wind Industry Association claimed that wind power would be “competitive and self-supporting on a national level by the end of the decade if assisted by tax credits and augmented by federally sponsored R&D”. That was 36 years ago. And there was no lack of assistance in the form of tax credits and federally sponsored R&D, along with a whole bunch of other punitive mandates and targets designed to cripple conventional generators and favour chaotically intermittent wind power.
Now, as then, claims from renewable energy rent seekers that wind and solar are truly competitive with nuclear, coal or gas evaporate the instant policymakers start talking about removing the subsidies that they depend upon; without which they would be bankrupted in no time.
With their 40th birthdays approaching, the wind and solar ‘industries’ are a pair of perpetual infants who – like Peter Pan – are determined to never grow up.
So, now’s as good as time as any for a little tough, parental ‘love’.
Wind PTC: Enough!
Robert Bradley Jr.
26 October 2020
“After a dozen extensions and nearly three decades on the books, it’s time to end the Production Tax Credit….”
Thirteen extensions of a 1992 tax credit for a supposedly infant industry in need of start-up aid. A subsidy has risen with inflation and become more lucrative with new technological design.
Little wonder that wind power can be “predatory” by under-pricing conventional electrical generation that does not get the subsidy. As in negative, zero, or small-positive prices. Little wonder that firm, dependable power sources are leaving the market–or require a corrective subsidy to continue to compete (a second wrong).
It’s a racket. And so 41 free market groups have aligned to urge the U.S. Senate to end the racket. The full letter, organized by the American Energy Alliance, follows.
Dear Majority Leader McConnell:
After a dozen extensions and nearly three decades on the books, it’s time to end the Production Tax Credit.
The Production Tax Credit (PTC) for wind energy was created in the Energy Policy Act of 1992. The PTC provides wind energy companies with a tax credit per kilowatt-hour of renewable electricity generation for the first 10 years a facility is in operation. The PTC was originally scheduled to expire in the year 1999, but Congress has extended its lifespan repeatedly, most recently at the end of 2019. Our coalition urges you to make that extension the last concession to the wind lobby.
Ending the wind PTC is an important energy policy course correction. First, it is pro-taxpayer. Since it was created in 1992, taxpayers have sent billions of dollars in credits to large multinational corporations in the wind industry. The U.S. Treasury estimates that the Production Tax Credit will cost taxpayers $40.12 billion from 2018 to 2027. With its most recent extension, the PTC will keep wind on the federal dole well into the 2030s.
Second, it is pro-consumer. Since wind is an unreliable intermittent source of energy, it requires extensive back-up from power sources like combined cycle natural gas. But keeping natural gas on standby means operation is less efficient than it otherwise would be, causing higher costs for ratepayers.
Despite the rhetoric about falling costs, existing natural gas power plants and coal power plants are far more affordable than new wind generation. On a dollar per kilowatt-hour basis and including the imposed costs, new wind power generation is twice as expensive as existing natural gas power.
Third, Americans deserve reliable power. With a natural bounty of energy resources, Americans have only self-imposed imbalances to fear. Flooding the grid with intermittent wind generation makes blackouts like California recently experienced a looming threat to all Americans. The PTC creates a false signal that makes California-style blackouts more likely in future.
Rather than having the fingers of Congress tipping the scales, our power sector should follow the wisdom of the market, providing the most reliable possible service at the lowest possible cost.
In some regions, such as the windy Great Plains, market conditions will support wind’s role in the energy mix. In regions lacking geographic advantages, such as the South, wind may have little role. A Congressional carveout for wind confuses the market and creates artificial incentives. In fact, the wind lobby itself has suggested the PTC has run its course.
In 2016, Tom Kiernan, CEO of the American Wind Energy Association, stated that “wind is now the cheapest source of new electric generating capacity” in many parts of the United States. Kiernan is also fond of implying that the wind industry is getting out of the federal subsidy business altogether, such as in 2017 when he said “we made a deal to drop our tax credit to zero over five years.”
Likewise, on a 2018 earnings call, James Robo, CEO of NextEra Energy, predicted that within a decade the cost of wind generation would be more competitive “without incentives” than sources like natural gas and coal.
Yet here we are in late 2020, with the wind industry mustering considerable funding to lobby for more taxpayer aid.
Despite the billions of dollars drained from taxpayers and the state mandates that force utilities to prioritize it, wind power makes up just 7 percent of U.S. electricity generation today.
The PTC has run its course. Tempting though it may be, Congress should not fall prey to the sunk cost fallacy. Though billions of dollars have been squandered already, we urge Congress to cut off the wind welfare tap.
Tom Pyle, American Energy Alliance
Bethany Marcum, Alaska Policy Forum
Lisa B. Nelson, ALEC Action
Phi Kerpen, American Commitment
Rick Manning, Americans for Limited Government
Brent Wm. Gardner, Americans for Prosperity
Grover Norquist, Americans for Tax Reform
Daniel F. Schmid, Bohemian Alps Wind Watchers
Robert Alt, Buckeye Institute
David T. Stevenson, Caesar Rodney Institute
Ryan Ellis, Center for a Free Economy
Andrew F. Quinlan, Center for Freedom and Prosperity
Jeffrey Mazzella, Center for Individual Freedom
Isaac Orr, Center of the American Experiment
Thomas Schatz, Council of Citizens Against Government Waste
Leo Knepper, Citizens Alliance of Pennsylvania
Mark Mathis, Clear Energy Alliance
Caleb Stewart Rossiter, CO2 Coalition
Craig Rucker, Committee For A Constructive Tomorrow
Myron Ebell, Competitive Enterprise Institute
Matthew Kandrach, Consumer Action for a Strong Economy
E. Calvin Beisner, Cornwall Alliance
Craig Richardson, Energy & Environment Legal Institute
Adam Brandon, FreedomWorks
George Landrith, Frontiers of Freedom
James Taylor, Heartland Institute
Jessica Anderson, Heritage Action for America
Fred Birnbaum, Idaho Freedom Action
Andrew Langer, Institute for Liberty
Brett Healy, John K. MacIver Institute for Public Policy
Donald van der Vaart, John Locke Foundation
Seton Motley, Less Government
Jason Hayes, Mackinac Center for Public Policy
Matthew Gagnon, Maine Policy Institute
Jonathan Small, Oklahoma Council of Public Affairs
Derrick Hollie, Reaching America
Mike Stenhouse, Rhode Island Center for Freedom & Prosperity
Paul J. Gessing, Rio Grande Foundation
Bette Grande, Roughrider Policy Center
David Williams, Taxpayers Protection Alliance
Jason Isaac, Texas Public Policy Foundation
3 thoughts on “Perpetual Subsidy Sucker: Why The Wind Industry Will Never Grow Up”
It’s refreshing to see that so many organizations recognize the limitations and disadvantages of wind generators. Penetrating the curtain of mass media wind/solar praise sometimes seems like an impossible task.
“It’s a racket. ”
Is there a protection racket behind the wind industry?
This letter will be filed under… “looney right wing gerbil warming deniers”, and forgotten about.