Self-Censored: Love Media Refuse to Cover Green Leader’s Backflip on Wind Power

Inconvenient facts like the wind industry’s rampant Eagle slaughter troubles the narrative and requires the mainstream press to do backflips to maintain a positive spin.

Remember, this is an ‘inevitable’ transition to an all wind and sun powered future. So, the slicing and dicing of millions of birds and bats, the destruction of pristine wilderness and whole rural communities is just collateral damage, right?

Over the last few posts, STT has been focused on former Australian Greens leader, Bob Brown, who has managed to ignite a debate centred on just how useless wind power is, and how much chaos and unnecessary carnage it causes. All because Dr Bob is railing against a few wind turbines set to be plonked in his backyard, notwithstanding that he was always ready to spear them into yours.

Although readers, viewers and listeners of Australia’s National Broadcaster, the ABC and the lefty Nine Group (now owner of the ultra-lefty Fairfax mastheads, the Sydney Morning Herald and The Age) would have been hard pressed to know what the rumpus was all about.

Working on the adage that no news is good news, the ABC and Nine ran a media blackout, barely mentioning something that has sent a fair number of Australians into a delicious frenzy over green hypocrisy, writ large.

Some might call it bias (as The Australian’s Gerard Henderson does), STT just calls it par for the course.

Elementary to leave Bob Brown’s wind farm comments unreported
The Australian
Gerard Henderson
20 July 2019

Arthur Conan Doyle’s character Sherlock Holmes referred to the curious incident of the dog that did not bark. This week witnessed another odd circumstance; namely, the unwillingness of certain media outlets to report former Greens leader Bob Brown’s cry about wind farms in northwest Tasmania.

On July 8, the Hobart Mercury published an article by Brown ­expressing opposition to the proposal by UPC Renewables to construct a wind farm comprising 200 towers on Robbins ­Island, which is close to Smithton.

The height of each tower is 270m, not much smaller than Sydney Tower or Melbourne’s ­Eureka Tower. As Brown put it, this is a wind farm too far. He ­objects to the proposal on several grounds.

First, it is not aesthetic — for example, mariners “will see this hairbrush of tall towers from 50km out to sea”. Second, “wind turbines kill birds”. Third, “the transmission lines are planned to cut through wild and scenic Tasmania”.

In short, Brown opposes the Robbins Island proposal because it is ugly and a bird killer. He is not ­opposed to all wind farms. However, this development is in a part of Tasmania of which he is particularly fond.

Currently president of the ­influential Bob Brown Foundation, Brown is one of the best known Australians. Not only in Tasmania, where he has been based for decades, but nationally. He first came to attention as an ­environmental activist, then as a politician in the Tasmanian House of Assembly and then as a Greens senator.

In view of his resume, it is not surprising that Brown has a particular following among many ABC viewers and listeners along with many readers of Nine’s newspapers. Yet both important media outlets have all but ignored his comments on Robbins Island.

The Australian’s Graham Lloyd gave the story page-one coverage on Monday and Tuesday. This was warranted since it was important news that so prominent an environmental activist as Brown is ­opposed to the construction of the biggest wind farm in Australia.

The GuardianAustralia has reported the matter but not so The Sydney Morning Herald or The Age. The ABC has joined in the boycott — with one exception. On July 15, the issue was discussed in the “newspapers” segment on the ABC TV News Breakfast program. The co-presenters were Paul Kennedy and Virginia Trioli and the guest commentator was media trainer Steve Carey.

Carey presented Lloyd’s story as “a dig at Dr Brown”. Trioli then opined that the tactic did not land because “it would make sense for an ecologist like him to actually look at certain pristine areas and go ‘Yeah wind farms, but not just there’.” Carey agreed and Trioli declared “that makes total sense”.

But does it? Brown’s critique of wind farms was not site specific. He cited the impact on scenery of such constructions — which is a common criticism.

And then there is the issue of wildlife. Here Kennedy commented: “And what about the old chestnut that you’re killing the birds?” Here Carey said he “didn’t see the quotes about specifically killing birds” but added that there were “concerns about high-tension wires”.

In fact, in his Mercury article Brown listed 25 species of international migratory and endangered shorebirds that would be adversely affected by the Robbins Island proposal. That doesn’t sound like “a chestnut”, does it?

Carey concluded by agreeing with Trioli that this issue was not necessarily “going to land” on Brown. But the point is not whether Brown has changed his mind on the appropriateness of wind ­energy but on whether his critique of the proposed Robbins Island ­development is plausible.

The point is that many a journalist and commentator has criticised opponents of wind farms on economic and/or environmental grounds. For example, in May 2014, Coalition treasurer Joe Hockey told broadcaster Alan Jones that he found wind farms “totally offensive”. He was referring to the turbines he saw around Lake George when driving from Sydney to Canberra.

Hockey said the Bungendore wind farm near Lake George was “a blight on the landscape”. Which is not dissimilar to Brown’s assessment of the proposed Robbins ­Island wind farms as impacting ­adversely on scenery.

At the time, Greens NSW parliamentarian John Kaye described Hockey as “pandering to the flat-earth, anti-wind brigade”. He added that this was “yet another sign that the renewable energy target is likely to be decimated, with Australia losing opportunities for investment in rural communities, reductions in greenhouse gas emissions and thousands of new jobs”.

A mere five years later, among the green-left, it is a matter of “don’t talk about Bob Brown”.

Greens leader Richard Di Natale has been quiet on this issue and the Australian Conservation Foundation claims it does not know enough about Brown’s views to make an informed comment. In one sense you can appreciate the problem faced by the Greens and the ACF. Their favourite news sources, the ABC and Nine newspapers, have not covered Brown’s apparent conversion about wind farms on the road from Hobart to Smithton. It’s a form of media denial.

The only leftist or left-of-centre mainstream publication to cover the issue is The Guardian Australia. Last Monday, Adam Morton reported Brown’s comments on the impact of the proposal on ­migratory birds and his acknow­ledgment that “wind farms are very diverting to people who have an eye to the natural beauty of ­Tasmania and its landscape”. Morton said the Bob Brown Foundation would not be campaigning against the Robbins Island wind farm. However, Brown himself will be involved in the public debate.

No doubt Brown’s words and deeds will be reported in the Tasmanian media. However, other Australians are entitled to have ready and easy access to this ­debate. Here the taxpayer-funded public broadcaster has a special ­responsibility to cover all sides of the issue.

This will not come about if the media declines to report what has become a rather loud barking dog in this renewable energy fight in what Sherlock Holmes probably once knew as Van Diemen’s Land.
The Australian

Got it?!? The less said about Dr Bob’s U-Turn on wind, the better.

About stopthesethings

We are a group of citizens concerned about the rapid spread of industrial wind power generation installations across Australia.

Comments

  1. Jacqueline Rovensky says:

    Another contradiction of Brown’s comments re Robbins Island and of course the ABC and other dedicated censorship advocates when it suits them – is that when people object to these projects on the ground of Visual Amenity and destruction of environments they are constantly told by the industry and these censorship advocates that the farming land has already been ‘altered’ and is no longer ‘pristine’, well what is Robbins Island – yes it is no doubt beautiful and it is utilised by many birds and possibly other creatures – but it is and has been for many years used to graze cattle!
    Now don’t they according to the Greens and other mindbogglingly stupid people who believe they have right on their side even if it’s wrong, constantly tell us Cows are horribly wrong for the environment and cause a huge amount of damage to it so it is no longer worth saving?
    Contradiction flows from them like a river flowing down a waterfall.
    The difference being water is eminently useful.

  2. Was on the 7:30 Report ladt night

  3. Reblogged this on ajmarciniak.

  4. Peter Pronczak says:

    What’s the difference between knowingly telling a partial truth and a lie?
    None, but ask a politician and the media what they think.

    Supposedly an egalitarian ‘fair go society, AU subsidies deny those living in high-rises and other dwellings from getting on the gravy train of ‘alternative energy (alternative to fair & cheap?), so they are subsidising the subsidies with no recourse for compensation.

    What’s being done about it? Nothing. All others receiving government benefits have to account for every $, yet pollies electoral allowances are an unaccountable gimme of between $32K-$46 depending on electorate size, with the average ‘allowance’ claimed, being $54K, whatever $s are ‘leftover’ can be pocketed.

    Want to be on a good thing? Just screw the public regardless of right, wrong or morality. Like the media hot air about freedom of speech and the public’s right to know, while being joined at the hip pocket with pollies definition of democracy, it’s all just lip service.

    Dr Bob and Dr Di Natale – What Hippocratic oath?

  5. Reblogged this on Climate- Science.

Leave a Reply to yarpos Cancel reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: