Inconvenient Truth: Wind Turbines are the Largest Cause of Bat Mortality

bat

The rampant slaughter of birds and bats by wind turbines is just another inconvenient truth for the wind cult. In this peer reviewed scientific paper, the scale of the destruction was spelled out loud and clear: wind turbines are now the leading cause of bat mortality.

Multiple mortality events in bats: a global review
Mammal Review
Thomas J. O’Shea, Paul M. Cryan, David T.S. Hayman, Raina K. Plowright, Daniel G. Streicker
18 January 2016

figure-2-bat-mortality

Abstract

  1. Despite conservation concerns for many species of bats, factors causing mortality in bats have not been reviewed since 1970. Here, we review and qualitatively describe trends in the occurrence and apparent causes of multiple mortality events (MMEs) in bats around the world.
  2. We compiled a database of MMEs, defined as cases in which ≥ 10 dead bats were counted or estimated at a specific location within a maximum timescale of a year, and more typically within a few days or a season. We tabulated 1180 MMEs within nine categories.
  3. Prior to 2000, intentional killing by humans caused the greatest proportion of MMEs in bats. In North America and Europe, people typically killed bats because they were perceived as nuisances. Intentional killing occurred in South America for vampire bat control, in Asia and Australia for fruit depredation control, and in Africa and Asia for human food. Biotic factors, accidents, and natural abiotic factors were also important historically. Chemical contaminants were confirmed causes of MMEs in North America, Europe, and in islands. Viral and bacterial diseases ranked low as causes of MMEs in bats.
  4. Two factors led to a major shift in causes of MMEs in bats at around 2000: the global increase of industrial wind-power facilities and the outbreak of white-nose syndrome in North America. Collisions with wind turbines and white-nose syndrome are now the leading causes of reported MMEs in bats.
  5. Collectively, over half of all reported MMEs were of anthropogenic origin. The documented occurrence of MMEs in bats due to abiotic factors such as intense storms, flooding, heat waves, and drought is likely to increase in the future with climate change. Coupled with the chronic threats of roosting and foraging habitat loss, increasing mortality through MMEs is unlikely to be compensated for, given the need for high survival in the dynamics of bat populations.

CONCLUSIONS

Many MMEs in bats have been reported over the years. Of the nine potential causes that we differentiated, intentional killing by people caused the greatest proportion of MMEs prior to 2000. People killed bats because they were considered sources of zoonotic disease, nuisances (e.g. bats that roosted in buildings), or, in Australia and Asia, competitors for fruit crops. People still kill and eat both insectivorous and pteropodid bats in Asia, Africa, and in some islands.

Efforts to control bovine rabies transmitted by common vampire bats in South America and southern North America led to indiscriminate killing of non-target cavernicolous bat species that continues to the present. Prior to 2000, about 11% of the reported MMEs were attributed to natural abiotic factors. Projected extreme weather due to continuing climate change (e.g. severe storms, flooding, and drought) may increase the number of abiotic MMEs in the future.

Two new causes of MMEs have taken precedence since around 2000: death due to collisions with wind turbines globally, and the fungal disease causing WNS in eastern North America. Reports of MMEs due to these two causes will probably soon outnumber all prior reports from all categories combined. Among all categories, MMEs due to viral or bacterial diseases were most rarely reported. Unexplained MMEs were not very common. This supports the hypothesis that many microparasitic infections of bats do not result in MMEs.

We believe that the life history attributes of bats historically allowed populations to compensate more easily for natural causes of mortality. Intentional killing by humans and very recent increases in mortality from other anthropogenic sources has put markedly greater pressures on many populations of bats. Bats globally could benefit from policy, education, and conservation actions targeting humancaused mortality. Such actions are particularly important in the face of the new and increasing threats of the 21st century.

Download PDF of O’Shea et al (2016) here.

dead bats1

About stopthesethings

We are a group of citizens concerned about the rapid spread of industrial wind power generation installations across Australia.

Comments

  1. Reblogged this on gottadobetterthanthis and commented:
    ~
    If windmills aren’t stopped soon enough, several species of bats may be the first extinctions due to man’s fears of global warming.

    Bats are capable enough to miss the blades, but as they dart past, the extreme air pressure changes near the blades blast the bats lungs. They shortly thereafter succumb by drowning as their lungs fill will fluid.

    For the record, I’ll take people over bats any day, but windmills are bad for us all.

  2. CraigAustin says:

    If your goals include reducing the human population by 85-99%, you are unlikely to shed tears over bats, these groups are hell bent on the most destructive and expensive ways to be completely unprepared for the coming cold.

  3. catweazle666 says:

    “How about turning them off at night?”

    How about turning them off altogether?

  4. william gray says:

    The whole thing is sick. I find it interesting that these stories don’t seem to get aired in the mainstream news media all that often- actually, I can’t remember reading anything about avian kills in our media lately. How to bring it to their attention or are they too embarressed to admit/highlight even more failings with this energy loser. Who is paying who.

  5. Another recent scientific article due out in a few months confirms this horrific news:

    Frick et al (2017) Fatalities at wind turbines may threaten population viability of a migratory bat, Biological Conservation, Volume 209, May 2017, Pages 172–177.

    The concluding sentence –

    “Given the possibility for near or total extinction from wind-energy-related fatalities, our results suggest that conservation planning to manage migratory bat populations should include actions to reduce bat fatalities at wind energy facilities in North America.”

    How about turning them off at night?

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: