No Upside: Adding More & More Wind Turbines Means Less & Less Power Generated

It’s no mystery that wind power generation depends on the wind. Less apparent is the fact that adding more turbines in a given location means less power gets generated, overall.

The law of diminishing returns applies with a real vengeance when turbulence from upwind turbines ruins the ability of their downwind brethren to generate power, even when the wind is blowing. The phenomenon is referred to in the trade as the “wake effect”.

Now that the US is covered in thousands of these things, including offshore from its Atlantic coast, there is an increasing body of data that shows that the more turbines that get added to the grid, the more useless wind power generation becomes – as the team from Jo Nova lays out below.

Wind turbines could steal as much as 38% of the power off turbines downwind and even from ones 50 kilometers away
Jo Nova Blog
Jo Nova
May 2024

The more wind turbines we have the more useless they are.

There goes those plans to cover the continental shelf with talismen to the Wind Gods.

New research shows wind turbines off the East Coast of the US could end up stealing as much as a third of the energy from other wind turbines downstream. And in some conditions, the turbulent wake they leave might stretch out 55 kilometers behind them. This effect is worst on turbines in the same “farm” but could even affect other wind farms a long way off.

The wake effect will be strongest in summer. We’ll just have to ask everyone to turn off their air conditioners then?

Scientific civilizations do this sort of research before they commit $10 trillion dollars, set up a trading scheme, and blow up the coal plants. Imagine if building a coal plant near another plant made it 30% less efficient on hot days…

Hat tip to the NetZeroWatch email list:

Wind turbine ‘wake effect’ could reduce arrays’ power output by 30%
Kirk Moore, WorkBoat

The researchers’ paper published March 14 in the journal Wind Energy Science suggests that offshore wind turbines off the U.S. East Coast could rob neighboring turbine arrays of wind speed and thus power generation depending on daily conditions, by more than 30%.

“Using computer simulations and observational data of the atmosphere, the team calculated that the wake effect reduces total power generation by 34% to 38% at a proposed wind farm off the East Coast,” according to the University of Colorado. ”Most of the reduction comes from wakes formed between turbines within a single farm.”

“But under certain weather conditions, wakes could reach turbines as far as 55 kilometers (34 miles) downwind and affect other wind farms. For example, during hot summer days, the airflow over the cool sea surface tends to be relatively stable, causing wakes to persist for longer periods and propagate over longer distances.”

Hub-height wind roses for the NYSERDA Hudson North (E05) and Hudson South (E06) floating lidars during the 1 September 2019 to 1 September 2020 period. The location of E06 is shown as the red diamond and E05 as the red triangle. The bottom row shows wind roses segregated by atmospheric stratification.

Ominously, the worst power deficits in these graphs are not the black spots but the red and white ones…

The percentage of power loss at ONE from internal wakes at (a) TKE_0 and (b) TKE_100.

First build 10,000 wind farms, then figure out how it works:

From the press release:

To better understand how the wind blows in the proposed wind farm area, Lundquist’s team visited islands off the New England coast and installed a host of instruments last December as part of the Department of Energy’s Wind Forecast Improvement Project 3. The project is a collaboration of researchers from CU Boulder, Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution and several other national laboratories.

The instruments, including weather monitors and radar sensors, will collect data for the next year or more. Previously, offshore wind power prediction models usually relied on intermittent data from ships and satellite observations. The hope is that with continuous data directly from the ocean, scientists can improve prediction models and better integrate more offshore wind energy into the grid.

As long as we try to collect wind energy, the nightmare of thousands of high voltage interconnector lines will never go away.

REFERENCE
Rosencrans et al (2024) Seasonal variability of wake impacts on US mid-Atlantic offshore wind plant power production Articles, Volume 9, issue 3 WES, 9, 555–583, 2024 https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-9-555-2024
Jo Nova Blog

2 thoughts on “No Upside: Adding More & More Wind Turbines Means Less & Less Power Generated

  1. Albert Betz calculated in 1966 that under perfect conditions, a turbine cannot extract more than 57% of the kinetic energy from a smoothly flowing fluid. I’m sure it’s worse in a turbulent fluid.

    The “drying out” effect noted by Denton has already been described, along with an observation that wind farms increase the temperature in their area by about 0.24°C. I thought they were supposed to save us from global warming. Another observation is reduced plant diversity.

    More in Section 7.5 in my book “Where Will We Get Our Energy?” Everything quantified. No vague handwaving. 350 bibliographic citations so you can check that I didn’t just make up stuff.

  2. Question:

    The turbulence generated by wind turbine blade movement would seem to have, at least as a working hypothesis, the following impacts:

    1. lifting particles of dust and pollen etc, into the atmosphere where they can cause whatever they now cause naturally, such as seeds for rain, fog, snow, hail.
    2. circulating air over ground with the effect of drying the ground faster than the natural conditions would ordinarily allow.
    3. Lift bugs higher in the air, increasing the altitude that their predator winged animals fly, increasing the risk of impact with the blades and with the supercompressed air produced there.
    4. disrupt the prediction of traditional weather patterns because these swarms of turbine blades are creating their own weather.
    5. changing the weather patterns of rainfall and snowfall.
    6. creating vortexes which may or may not trigger the creation of larger vortexes for tornadoes.
    7. this is only my first critical thinking thoughts, I am sure many others will have more.

Leave a reply to Van Snyder Cancel reply