So-called wind power ‘constraint payments’ are more like a kidnapper’s ransom, than a genuine commercial transaction. There aren’t many exchanges that involve a producer claiming a fee for producing absolutely nothing, at all.
But when your product is only available in random, chaotic spurts (or not at all), apparently the rules change.
Up to December 2019, British wind power outfits had collected over £650,000,000 for doing nothing at all; the cost to power consumers was almost £1bn over the last five years and that figure is expected to soar to over £500m a year, or even more.
Wind farms backed by green subsidies could be paid more to switch off
The Telegraph
Emma Gatten
28 January 2023
Wind farms backed by government subsidies could be paid more to switch off than to generate power, The Telegraph has learnt.
At particularly windy times, the National Grid pays producers to switch off rather than overload the local system, with the costs passed on to household energy bills.
Producers offer the price at which they are willing to switch off, which is normally around the market rate for electricity, currently at record highs because of the energy crisis.
Wind producers on newer government subsidy contracts are paid a fixed price, generally below current market rates, to generate electricity.
By switching off, producers may therefore be able to make rates well above their fixed prices.
Although the loophole only applies to about seven per cent of wind farmer producers on so-called “contracts for difference” (CfD) – the newer subsidy system – the issue could grow as new wind farms come online.
Developers of the newest wind farms have offered to produce power for a guaranteed price of as little as £37 per megawatt-hour (MWh).
That compares to wholesale electricity prices currently around £150/MWh, which are expected to stay at record-high levels for years to come.
Meanwhile, the National Grid forecast that levels of curtailment will grow fourfold in the next decade, from 3.8 terawatt-hours (TWh) in 2022 to 15TWh in 2030, with costs forecast to reach £2.5 billion a year
In 2022, consumers paid £215 million to turn wind farms off, and £717 million to buy gas-powered electricity to make up the difference, according to figures from the UK Wind Curtailment Monitor.
The Telegraph revealed this week that wind farms could be paid to switch off even at times when the National Grid is paying households to turn off their gadgets because of blackout fears.
However, Craig MacKinlay, a Tory MP and chairman of the Net Zero Scrutiny Group, said: “The fact that hundreds of millions of pounds are being paid annually to wind farms not to generate, with these costs added to consumer bills, is a national scandal.”
Mr MacKinlay said the issue highlighted that “the intermittency of renewables with gas having to be used as the reliable balancer means wind companies are reaping the cream but doing nothing to help energy security”.
He added: “BEIS [Department for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy] lawyers who drafted these appalling contracts are responsible for billions of pounds of additional costs to consumers.
“The complexity of the energy system and its pricing is a direct result of distorting a functioning market on the altar of net zero.”
A government spokesman said: “The Government is currently undertaking a review of electricity market arrangements. Curtailment payments are used by the National Grid ESO, as well as in other nations around the world, to safely manage electricity supply on a day-to-day basis.”
The Telegraph
They’ve been rigging the green message for nearly 50 years. They knew back in 1976, wind turbines would have an impact on climate/precipitation, noise, insects and birds, but the crooked bastards siting at the highest levels, rigged all the studies to hide these terrible impacts.
The absurd NASA studies on wind turbine precipitation impacts, were deliberately set up to find nothing. With their turbine running at half speed, they waited for these winds. Winds that would blow the rain in a direction with few rain gauges. They only collected rain data with the turbine running on these two nights.
NASA”S studies on noise, insects and bird mortality were just as rigged. There is no plausible deniability. These studies had nothing to do with science and were clearly rigged to hide impacts.
My estimate is that this industry owes the American people over a trillion dollars because of the fraudulent mitigation of turbine impacts. https://www.windtaskforce.org/profiles/blogs/wind-industry-owes-the-american-people-over-a-trillion-dollars
Click to access Infrasound-wind-turbines-4-August-2015.pdf
MULTI-MUNICIPAL WIND TURBINE WORKING GROUP
MARK DAVIS, DEPUTY MAYOR, ARRAN-ELDERSLIE, CHAIR / STEWART HALLIDAY, DEPUTY MAYOR, GREY HIGHLANDS, CO-CHAIR 1925 BRUCE ROAD 10, BOX 70, CHESLEY, ON NOG 1L0 / 519-363-3039 / FAX: 519-363-2203 areld@bmts.com
Compiled by
Keith Stelling, MA, (McMaster) MNIMH, MCPP (England) Reviewed by
William K. Palmer, P. Eng.
Carmen Krogh, BSc (Pharm), provided comments on the health component
July, 2015
“We now know that subaudible pulsating infrasound can be detected inside homes near operating wind turbines. It can also be identified up to 10 kilometres distant. We know also that very low levels of infrasound and LFN are registered by the nervous system and affect the body even though they cannot be heard. The research cited in this report implicates these infrasonic pulsations as the cause of some of the most commonly reported “sensations” experienced by many people living close to wind turbines including chronic sleep disturbance, dizziness, tinnitus, heart palpitations, vibrations and pressure sensations in the head and chest etc.
Similarly, there is medical research (also cited below) which demonstrates that pulsating infrasound can be a direct cause of sleep disturbance. In clinical medicine, chronic sleep interruption and deprivation is acknowledged as a trigger of serious health problems. “
There won’t be a dickie bird left in England.
Strange how much black smoke “Green” energy sources and EVs generate, isn’t it?