Industrial Degeneration: Crippling Cost of Subsidised Wind & Solar Destroying Our Economic Future

Thanks to the hidden and crippling cost of subsidised wind and solar, households and businesses are being hit with staggering bills, with prices at levels unimaginable, until recently.

Double digit annual percentage increases are now the norm.

As we reported yesterday, Brits are already suffering power prices more than double what they were 12 months ago, with prices set to double again before their next winter is over. Germans are watching their power prices spiral out of control; with state-controlled rationing sets of institutionalised across the country.

Hopelessly intermittent wind and solar sit at the heart of this economy wrecking chaos. Notwithstanding the efforts of renewable energy rent-seekers to pretend otherwise.

Politicos and the MSM continue to blame everything else under the sun, Vlad Putin, included.

Energy users can only despair, with logic and reason banished from energy policy, long ago. Engineers don’t get a look in. Instead, the realm is dominated by the arts/law grads who became political staffers and then MPs, who apparently know everything there is to know about power generation. Just ask them.

As Alan Moran details below, the crippling cost of subsidised wind and solar is destroying prosperity, as if that was the very purpose of the so-called renewable energy ‘transition.’

Wrecking a Nation One Electricity Bill at a Time
Quadrant Online
Alan Moran
29 July 2022

The first thing to recognise is that for many years now governments — Labor and Coalition alike — have been hard at work destroying the low-cost electricity market that Australian businesses and consumers once enjoyed. The second thing to note is that there is an actual undertone of energy realism — yes, really! –about the Albanese government, but it is no portent of good news: “You’ll know what we’re up against when your electricity bill arrives,” the Treasurer said on Thursday (July 28). That would be the bill we were assured during election season would fall by $275 once Labor waved its magic wand.

We can see the degeneration of Australia’s electricity security graphically presented in the chart below which tracks July electricity prices from 2015 to the present day. This year, prices are on average $350 per megawatt hour, a far cry from $50 back in 2015. With subsidies for renewables leading to the closure of crucial power stations they crept up to $85 by 2019, which still seems cheap in comparison with the Himalayan ascent towards $400 that has occurred since 2021.

We will not see bills cut. What we will see is a doubling of household bills as the present spot prices work through the retail system. The only thing that can stop this in the near term will be if high prices lead to the closure of major energy users – aluminium smelters, for instance. Oh, the tragic irony!  The pride of the nation’s industrial base now needs to be supported by the very governments whose policies brought the high electricity prices that wrecked the economic viability of their operations.

Of course, while closures of heavy industries’ energy users would give some price relief to household bills in the short-term, what such a measure really means is de-industrialisation and, as a result, permanently lower living standards. In the long term, we can mend the supply only by ceasing to discriminate against low cost coal and, possibly, nuclear.

As in Europe and US, Australian politicians have remained resolutely  blind to the fact that the presumed “cheapness” of the wind and solar they promote hangs on their ongoing need for subsidies. We are already spending at least $7 billion a year on wind/solar subsidies and the ALP policy is to markedly increase this. Their proposed measures include:

♦ a fourfold increase, from $20 billion to $80 billion, in the cost of transmission by which electricity is moved around the nation — an increase required because of the less dense electricity represented by wind and solar;

♦ a Net Zero public service

♦ community batteries

♦ the so-called safeguard mechanism to force businesses to reduce their emissions

♦ forced reductions in agricultural emissions – that might extend to suppression of nitrogenous fertiliser use, a measure that has cut Sri Lankan farm output by a third, bankrupting that country, and where the introduction of similar policies in the Netherlands is causing massive turmoil. Canada, too, has poised to join this march of folly and has announced forced reductions in these fertilizers’ use.

♦ on top of all the above, we are to have subsidies for electric vehicles, thereby encouraging a further massive drain on the grid

This madness is not confined to Australia. The Biden administration as soon as it hit the decks started cancelling gas exploration rights and pipelines, announced massive new renewable subsidies and, on top of all that, legislation that will force businesses to adopt costly new environmental standards.

There is now some realisation in the UK of the problems this has caused, with both contenders to replace Boris Johnson each saying they want to reduce taxes on electricity, a proposal that will do nothing more than paper over some cracks. Bear in mind that UK electricity prices have already doubled this year.

Another response is to try rejigging the electricity market. The UK government intends to have suppliers paid according to their bids rather than the market price. It’s a bit more paper on another growing crack, as all this measure will see is a change in bidding strategies with no impact on price and a considerable increase in administrative resources.

The vulnerability of continental Europe, due entirely to abandoning stable supplies of electricity and subsidising wind and solar, is dramatically evident in the crisis confronting Germany, Italy and other countries, a long-brewing crisis explosively triggered by Russia’s denial of a stable gas supply. Few politicians understand the real reasons for the crisis: replacing stable and low-cost fossil fuels and nuclear power with wind and solar. Like a drunk driver speeding the wrong way down a freeway, they spare not a spoken word or thought for the catastrophe just ahead.

France, at least, has abandoned its own green policies and is returning to nuclear power. In Germany’s case efforts to avert disaster remained dogged and hobbled by green fantasies, with the energy minister seeking to continue closing the three nuclear power stations that remain in operation. The excuse, a spurious one, is a lack of fuel rods.

Make no mistake, hardship during the northern hemisphere’s coming winter is inevitable. After that, as the world tilts, it will be Australia’s turn and that promise of $275 annual saving will be an even bigger sick joke than it is today.

Alan Moran, of Regulation Economics, wrote the chapter “Current trends and perspectives in Australia” in Local Energy Markets edited by Tiago Pinto et al and recently published by Elsevier.
Quadrant Online

8 thoughts on “Industrial Degeneration: Crippling Cost of Subsidised Wind & Solar Destroying Our Economic Future

    1. Please help yourself, and direct your friends and family to do so too. We hope to help people understand how energy policy has been hijacked by vested interests and why that matters for everyone.

  1. Could you have a look at the gas Hexafluaride that is used to insulate electrical nodes in the windmills. Germany is the biggest emitter of this gas, which contributes more to green house gases than carbon. Source: Remix news and ARD Tageschau

    1. You mean “hexafluoride” I assume. Your source is incorrect, there is 37,735,849 times more CO2 than hexafluoride in our 8mileosphere aka the troposphere which is the first 8 miles up of our atmosphere that contains a whopping nothing of 10.6 parts per TRILLION of hexafluoride. CO2 is at 400 parts per million or it could be expressed as .0004 or .04% or as 1/2500 ratio. The amount of “hexafluoride” in the 8mileosphere is a ratio of .0000000000106 or expressed as a % is .00000000106% or as a ratio 1/94,339,622,641.50943

      1. Just read this “According to the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, SF6 is a climate killer. In fact, it is 26,087 times more harmful to the climate than carbon dioxide.”

        ROFL more fear porn, “harmful” as in makes an alleged change, not actually causing harm. Let’s see what that comes out to then, 1/94,339,622,641.50943 of the atmosphere is then filled to the brim with this dangerous SF6 so at 26,087 times more change than carbon dioxide we could say that it takes 26,087 times more carbon dioxide to equal SF6 in a wrestling match. That arrives carbon at a 1,446.538469605695 advantage over SF6 so obviously this is an exaggeration. Let’s assume for the sake of how science works most of the time – on assumptions – that this calculation is correct giving carbon the edge, but adding that SF6, the science should show that if both GASSES combined in the air were there, it would remain IMPOSSIBLE for those gasses to stop CONVECTION. The simple method to test this is to since both CO2 and SF6 are in the air everywhere, take in a deep breath, exhale it all out over an open doorway on a hot day or in winter and see how well that insulates since the claim of all these gasses is that they “insulate” and thus “trap heat” and thus we are all doomed. It’s a total JOKE.

        One of the many clues of climate scamism, never believe anything said when they say “cllimate killer” it cannot be killed nor changed by man except in the most localized minuscule amounts say for example the climate of Southern California which is a highly irrigated desert dependent on the Colorado River water being pumped in, the moisture in the air affects the climate there, mostly would be dry air if there was not such massive amounts of irrigation.

        Source of SF6 wild claim:

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s