Dumb & Dumber: Continued Wind & Solar Obsession Defies All Logic & Reason

The renewable energy pit deepens, but there’s no indication the dolts in charge will ever stop digging. The, by now obvious, consequences of attempting to rely on sunshine and breezes include another annual power price increase of over 20% this month and routine power rationing by postcode. In response, there’s a growing groundswell of hostility to the glib and superficial rhetoric that passes for energy policy debate in this country. Bewilderment is giving way to frustration and outright anger.

Australia’s new PM, Anthony Albanese and his gormless Energy Minister are odds-on to win the Dumbest Pair in Politics award, with their efforts to destroy what’s left of Australia’s reliable and affordable power generation system.

STT has consistently described the policies that got us here as “suicidal”. But the approach being taken now to double down on the debacle, evidences clearly murderous intent.

As Europe backtracks from its self-inflicted renewable energy calamity – restarting and building nuclear plants and quietly firing up mothballed coal-fired plants – those lessons have had no apparent effect on the PM and Bowen. To the contrary, these clowns reckon that the solution is even more of the same.

The Australian’s Nick Cater details below the insanity that passes for energy policy in this country.

Dutton wise to resist Albanese’s green grandstanding
The Australian
Nick Cater
27 June 2022

Full marks to Peter Dutton for not falling for Anthony Albanese’s false promise of an end to the climate wars. With hindsight, Labor’s back-of-the-envelope 43 per cent reduction target should have been subjected to rigorous scrutiny before the election. Coalition campaign strategists didn’t have the heart for it, however, seeing climate policy as a zero-sum game in which winning hearts and minds in the regions and outer suburbs would lose them support in their metropolitan heartland.

Labor’s uncontested thought bubble is about to be given the force of law in an early act of parliamentary grandstanding. Dutton resisted Albanese’s overtures to back the legislation, forcing the Prime Minister to make his first pact with the Greens to ensure the legislation passes in the Senate. The horse-trading will be interesting to watch.

Turning an ill-conceived aspirational target into a legislated straitjacket is less than sensible at a time when the rest of the industrialised world is looking for wriggle room. Barely six months ago, Germany was investing its hopes for energy security in the newly completed Nord Stream 2 pipeline from Russia via the Baltic. Two days before Vladimir Putin’s invasion of Ukraine, Chancellor Olaf Scholz declared all bets were off. Now a bill providing the legal basis to burn more coal for power generation is making its way through the German parliament and negotiations have begun to replace Russian coal with imports from countries such as the US, Colombia and South Africa.

The revival of the fortunes of coal in Germany is not expected to last for long. Its chief purpose will be to firm the abundant sources of weather-dependent renewable energy in which Western Europe has been investing for 20 years. In the medium to long term, this task will be accomplished more efficiently with gas, which is why Germany is belatedly seeking to invest in gas development in friendlier parts of the world than Russia and why plans are under way to build gas import facilities in German ports.

The same dynamic is driving the Australian energy market where the supply and cost of gas on the east coast is keeping energy planners awake at night. Yet the gas market received scant attention in the policy Labor took to the election, which is built on the delusion that the answer to intermittent renewables is to install more intermittent renewables. Build enough windmills, the thinking goes, and the wind will come.

Energy Minister Chris Bowen has been offered no shortage of opportunities to crab-walk Labor’s policy towards something more credible in the past five weeks. He might have decried the underinvestment in new gas generation over the past nine years, or the madness of the Victorian government in banning onshore exploration for gas, conventional or otherwise. He could have denounced the virtue-seeking green activists who have used every trick in the book to stall the development of gas at Narrabri in NSW, which even now is not expected to come on tap until 2025.

Instead, Bowen has chosen to ratchet up the renewables rhetoric, suggesting further investment in wind and solar with a smattering of batteries is the answer to stabilising the grid.

Yet a shortage of investment is hardly the problem. In 2021, investment in rooftop solar broke records for the fifth year running with 3GW of new capacity in nearly 390,000 systems, each one ready to inject energy into the grid in the heat of day when there is anything but a shortage. Fewer than 3 per cent of the new schemes were accompanied by batteries, which continue to defy predictions that they are about to become efficient and affordable.

Large-scale renewable investment increased for the third straight year. The effect has been to increase the glut of energy at the wrong time of day, pushing spot prices lower and making baseload generation less profitable, putting further stress on the business model of the gas- and coal-fired generators we rely on to provide the market with inertia and system strength. Rather than improving the reliability of supply, the record investment in renewables has had precisely the opposite effect. The transmission system has never been so susceptible to erratic frequency shifts and voltage instability, according to the Australian Energy Regulator’s most recent State of the Energy Market Review. An inertia shortage in South Australia is making it difficult to connect more renewable energy supplies to the grid. The lack of inertia, that was once provided synchronous energy from coal-driven turbines in SA, makes it harder to prevent sudden sags and surges in voltage.

These are the eminently foreseeable problems of transitioning to renewables too quickly. Locking Labor’s ambitious emissions reduction target into legislation will do nothing to solve those challenges but do plenty to make them worse. Like the conceptually flawed 20 per cent Renewable Energy Target introduced with such fanfare by the Rudd government, it will lead to capital misallocation on an industrial scale. It will incentivise further investment in weather-dependent renewables with no regard to the associated investment required to overcome the problems of unreliability.

Worse, it will lock Australia on a pathway to the middle of a century with no flexibility to alter course should circumstances change. At a time when much of the industrialised world is looking for a more flexible path towards energy reduction, Australia is about to do the very opposite.

All of which presents Dutton with the opportunity to demonstrate the difference between a Labor climate and energy policy and the pragmatic, more worldly approach that drives Liberal governments at their best. It is an approach tempered by an understanding that the world is a complex place, governments are neither omniscient nor omnipotent and every intervention will have unintended consequences.

If the intention is to make energy affordable and reliable as well as cleaner, we must accept that there must be trade-offs. Mandating cleaner energy under force of law will only come at the expense of available supply and our ability to pay for it.
The Australian

Meet Dumb and Dumber.

About stopthesethings

We are a group of citizens concerned about the rapid spread of industrial wind power generation installations across Australia.


  1. Peter Pronczak says:

    The Snowy Mountain Scheme was constructed under national security legislation. Primarily as it was recognised that coastal power stations could be destroyed by sea based warfare & to stop NSW & VIC from bickering over national compensation for the loss of control of their land.

    Apparently, reliable energy is no longer a national security priority. Why not, has not been explained.
    AU although not a NATO member, has attended its European meeting, is supplying equipment to Ukraine as the WWIII proxy, & manufacturing equipment & munitions to NATO compatible standards. AU is a NATO member in all but name. As such we could save the $3.5B compensation payment to France; as a senior NATO member were they to use their spare capacity to at least manufacture the submarine hulls. Until it is decided who will supply the nuclear propulsion units.
    This does rely on whether the whole idea is to sucker a maximum amount of funds from the lower class self-policing wage slaves. That according to some, are in overabundant disposable numbers – depletion would also apparently save the planet & natural resources; at least those not blown to kingdom come.

    It does beg the question of who do ‘our’ supposed politicians represent when the majority have to pay increasingly higher costs & work longer hours, regardless that increasing technology is supposed to bring costs down.
    Yet the intention, led by Scandinavian countries, is to lower the tax on interest gained from capital. This favours inherited wealth particularly that accumulated by royalty. This dates back to the supposed divine right of kings & the open practice of slavery to gain goods from the ancient Silk Road.
    Not much has changed over the centuries & it’s getting worse while being hidden under manipulative rhetoric.

    Please note; no post notifications received since 1/07/2022

  2. Jim Wiegand - Wildlife Biologist says:

    Forgot to mention, blackouts are easy to eliminate, but they want them. For the Green Cartel, blackouts are a tool that will be used.

  3. Jim Wiegand - Wildlife Biologist says:

    While the insanity of Wind energy is mind boggling to most, this will make a lot of sense. Green is the new Nazi and they want control. These criminals have stolen trillions from the free countries of the world and created bogus research to keep their fraud in play. They’re not robbing China or Russia, just the so-called free people. By attacking fossil fuels, it creates an excuse that makes the masses more malleable and dependent.

  4. ronaldsteinptsadvancecom says:

    Breezes and sunshine will save the country!!!!
    If not, back to darkness and the lifestyles of the 1800’s!

  5. Terry Conn says:

    Nick says ‘the revival of coal in Germany is not expected to last long’ – I wouldn’t bet on that!

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: