Great ‘Green’ Job Hoax: Only China Profits From Making Wind Turbines & Solar Panels

The promise of thousands of jobs building wind turbines and solar panels is a renewable energy mantra; there are – but only in China.

China itself is building nuclear power plants and hundreds more coal-fired power plants, as if its economic livelihood depends on it.

Meanwhile, in those Western countries foolish enough to attempt to run on sunshine and breezes, those few jobs that did materialise are fast disappearing.

The article by David Rose below should be essential reading for Australians, where the corporate crony capitalist class is pushing a net-zero carbon dioxide gas emissions target, based on the ludicrous claim that hundreds of thousands of new jobs will be generated.

Net-zero carbon dioxide gas emissions targets are all about increasing and extending subsidies to costly and unreliable wind and solar, with further subsidies to pipe dream projects such as ‘green’ hydrogen and mythical mega-batteries. Rent-seekers already in on the renewable energy scam are, naturally, all for it.

However, as laid out below, don’t expect any meaningful or lasting employment. Unless, of course, you’re a Uighur slave building solar panels in a factory somewhere hidden in China.

How China made a mockery of Boris Johnson’s great green jobs boast
Daily Mail
David Rose
13 October 2021

A bleak autumn day at Methil on the south Fife coast. In front of us, the once-thriving yard where some of the North Sea’s biggest oil and gas platforms were built is almost empty.

There’s just mud, puddles and piles of rusting steel. If Scotland had tumbleweed, it would be tumbling.

‘This was supposed to be the seething epicentre of the green industrial revolution, the Saudi Arabia of windpower,’ retired GMB union convenor Mike Sullivan, 70, tells me.

We’re standing on a low hill overlooking the yard, facing the sea. He shrugs and gestures to the scene in front of us: ‘Why is the place not buzzing? Where is all the activity?’

In the middle of the last decade, the Methil yard and two sister sites were owned by a firm called BiFab, employing more than 2,000 people directly and on contracts.

The workers had adapted their skills — honed over years of building structures to anchor fuel rigs to the seabed — for the green revolution.

They were constructing steel jackets up to 200 feet high — and weighing as much as 30,000 tonnes — which served as the anchoring legs for offshore wind turbines. Today, BiFab has gone bust.

The yard’s new owners, Harland and Wolff, have precious little business — just one contract to build eight anchoring jackets for the Neart na Gaoithe windfarm off the Fife coast, that will create between 290 and 400 temporary jobs.

Despite the rapid expansion of windfarms off Scotland, the green revolution is passing Methil by.

Only recently, the energy giant SSE, which boasts it has developed more offshore turbines than any other firm on Earth, announced details of Scotland’s biggest windfarm.

Called Seagreen — a £3 billion project with a capacity of 1.075 gigawatts, enough to supply 1.6 million homes when the wind is blowing — it is being developed just 30 miles out to sea from Methil.

Yet none of Seagreen’s steel jackets are being made there. Instead, most are being manufactured by the Fluor Heavy Industries Corporation in Zhuhai, in southern China.

Another Chinese company, Jutal Offshore Oil, is making the foundations for the turbines. When they are ready, everything will be transported by gigantic, diesel-burning barges halfway across the world to the Fife coast.

‘We thought we’d be getting Seagreen, work that would have lasted years,’ sighs Sullivan.

‘We enjoyed working there. The shopfloor management was good. This should have been the jewel in Scotland’s renewable energy crown. But it’s always been just promises, promises, promises.

‘The impact on our community has been devastating. Skilled men, fitters, welders — if they’re not unemployed, they’ve gone to lower paid jobs. The younger ones are all heading south. One guy I know is driving for Amazon.’

SSE refuses to say what it is paying for the Chinese jackets, but it is safe to assume they are significantly cheaper than they would be if made in Scotland — in part due to China’s low-cost, coal-fired energy.

Last time Methil got a big contract, to make 26 jackets for the Beatrice farm in 2016, they cost £4 million each.

Energy prices in Scotland are usually well over double those in China and make up around a quarter of the cost of manufacturing items like turbine jackets.

Wages in China are also lower. In 2019, the average salary in Beijing and the industrial cities of the south was £16,500 — just over half the UK rate.

A five-minute walk around Methil’s centre confirms that it’s struggling. Businesses are boarded-up. The area looks far from prosperous.

And the great irony is that for years politicians have been promising that green industries will result in huge numbers of jobs in Britain and create prosperity while at the same time saving the planet.

Back in 2009, in the days of New Labour, the then energy secretary Ed Miliband proclaimed that the offshore wind industry would employ ‘tens of thousands of workers’ by the end of the following decade — in other words, by the end of last year.

These would, he said, be in ‘manufacturing, transporting, installing and operating new turbines’.

In a 1,000-page white paper, he accepted that bills for both households and businesses would rise as the country converted to green energy and implemented eco-friendly policies, but the benefits would more than compensate for this: a total of 400,000 new ‘green jobs’ by 2020.

Shortly before losing office in 2010, the former prime minister Gordon Brown went further, boasting that Britain’s offshore industry was already ‘ahead of every other country’ in the world.

In his glittering green future, offshore wind alone would generate ‘up to 70,000 jobs by 2020’.

The pledges continued under David Cameron’s coalition. In 2011, the Lib Dem energy secretary Chris Huhne, later jailed for lying over a speeding conviction, addressed the annual conference of RenewableUK, the green energy lobby group.

‘Renewable energy technologies will deliver a third industrial revolution,’ he said, ‘blazing a trail of start-ups and jobs.’

Nowhere was the hyperbole quite so extreme as in Scotland where the former SNP first minister Alex Salmond boasted that the country would become ‘the Saudi Arabia’ of renewables.

His deputy, John Swinney, claimed building wind farms off the Scottish coast would create ‘28,000 direct jobs and a further 20,000 indirect jobs in related industries by 2020’. In Methil, the promises have turned to dust.

Certainly, since 2010, there have been plenty of new offshore windfarms. Britain’s capacity has doubled to 10 gigawatts, and under Mr Johnson’s 10 Point Plan For A Green Industrial Revolution, which he launched last November, it is set to quadruple again by 2030 — so creating (of course!) ‘tens of thousands’ of new manufacturing jobs.

Furthermore, the PM’s announcement at the Tory conference that all electricity in the UK will be powered by clean fuel by 2035 has only added to hopes of employment opportunities.

But, in reality, few of the jobs have materialised in Scotland. In fact, offshore wind manufacturing here is in severe decline.

In 2018, Freedom of Information Act requests filed by the Unite trade union revealed that far from the promised 28,000 Scottish manufacturing jobs in offshore wind, there were just 1,700. And since then, the situation has deteriorated.

Last month, Scotland’s only factory making turbine towers, at Campbeltown in Argyll, closed permanently.

So no one is making offshore towers in Britain, although turbine blades are still made at the Danish firm Vestas on the Isle of Wight, and Siemens Gamesa in Hull.

As for solar energy, Britain’s only large panel factory, in Wrexham in Wales, shut down in 2013, with the loss of 615 jobs.

A report by Strathclyde University last June said that in 2019 there were 1,190 full-time Scottish manufacturing jobs across all types of renewable energy, including hydro power, solar, onshore and offshore wind, and a further 1,000 ‘indirectly’ employed in the renewables supply chain.

It claimed renewable energy in total accounted for 22,900 jobs, but this figure included those working in areas such as ‘real estate’, ‘accommodation and food services’, ‘communications’ and ‘arts and recreation’.

‘We’ve been reduced to scrabbling for crumbs from our own table,’ says Gary Smith, the GMB’s General Secretary.

‘Sure, there are some jobs in assembly, maintenance and sweeping away the dead birds. But the claim that we’re creating thousands of high-value manufacturing jobs isn’t true. We just haven’t had a green industrial strategy.’

Yet while dreams of vast numbers of green jobs have been dashed here in Britain, the very opposite is happening in China.

As the story of the Seagreen wind farm shows, the country is ruthlessly taking advantage of the West’s conversion to eco-friendly energy production.

This week, the Global Warming Policy Foundation will publish a paper by economist Professor Jun Arima of Tokyo University, who represented Japan at 15 UN climate change conferences, of which the latest, Cop26, is taking place in Glasgow from the end of the month.

‘Chinese companies are the main beneficiaries of the green agenda’, the report states boldly.

‘China is becoming dominant in the wind power market. Seven of the world’s top ten turbine manufacturers are Chinese,’ it adds, warning that, as Britain heads for Net Zero emissions, ‘cheaper Chinese-made wind turbines are expected to take a large share of the market.’

Already, the paper reveals, China has captured 70 per cent of the global solar panel market and wiped out once-booming solar manufacturing industries in America and Germany — as well as Wales.

Other elements of Britain’s green policies will benefit China too, says Professor Arima. For example, China has long found it difficult to compete with established car-makers in Britain, Europe and Japan. But when it comes to electric vehicles (EVs), he says, ‘China is on the same starting line.’

The cheapest electric car in Britain is the Skoda CITIGOe iV, at £15,000. By contrast, Prof Arima says, in China ‘a locally manufactured EV priced at just £3,000 is selling well… the trend towards electric vehicles is extremely advantageous for China, and sweeps away the decades of technological advantage its competitors have accumulated’.

The benefits for China are also set to increase as a result of its grip on the world supply of rare earth elements.

These are vital for making a wide range of products, from huge magnets in wind turbines to the lithium ion batteries used in electric vehicles and mobile phones.

China, says Professor Arima’s report, already produces more than 60 per cent of the world’s supply.

But how has the People’s Republic managed to undercut the global market for green goods so efficiently? The supremely ironic answer is through its shameless use of one of the cheapest — and dirtiest — fuels on the planet: coal.

In the first of a series of exposés of China, I described the staggering degree with which the country’s CO2 emissions are increasing as it continues to build new coal-fired energy plants.

China has 1,080 coal-powered plants, compared to just four in the UK (and Boris Johnson has pledged to end coal-power generation here by 2024).

The coal-fired plants China has in the pipeline alone have a greater capacity than the entire UK electricity network.

It is coal that has enabled China to establish global dominance in vital, energy-intensive industries — steel, aluminium, plastics and cement, to name a few — where UK production has plummeted thanks to high energy costs.

Now another sector needs to be added to that list — renewable technology. Just as it once stole ‘ordinary’ industrial jobs from other countries, China is now stealing green ones, too, on a formidable scale.

So we are importing more and more green technology made as a result of burning coal from the country with the highest CO2 emissions on the planet. And sacrificing British jobs as we do so.

Renewables advocates love to brag that the cost of building wind farms is falling. One reason, it is clear, is that manufacturing them has gone to places with much lower costs, such as China.

Certainly, China is investing hugely in green energy for its own domestic purposes, but as I revealed last month, renewables still contribute minimally to the country’s national grid at present.

Tokyo University’s Professor Arima says that China’s heavy use of coal means, for example, that ‘embedded emissions’ in Chinese solar panels are far higher than they would be if made elsewhere.

(In May, a report by Sheffield Hallam University also claimed that Chinese solar panels are made with the help of Muslim Uighur-forced labour in detention camps.)

‘China is manipulating Western climate policy for its own advantage,’ Professor Arima told me.

‘As a UN Cop negotiator, I have seen that they do whatever they consider necessary,’ he added.

‘One day their emissions will peak out. But when they do, it won’t be to prevent global warming but because they’ve decided that’s in their interest. This is very different to how naive Americans and Europeans see them.’

Jeremy Nicholson, a senior strategist at the International Federation of Industrial Energy Consumers, which represents manufacturers in the UK and EU, agrees. ‘Why are people so gullible?’ he asked. ‘Why are we giving a free pass to the world’s biggest carbon emitter?

‘If you’re trying to compete internationally, you can live with carbon prices and targets — but only if your rivals do, too.

‘The starting point for Cop26 should be that China is a prosperous, industrial economy, and so must shoulder its share of environmental responsibilities. Yet they’re getting away with vague statements and weasel words.’

Last month, RenewableUK held a conference on global offshore wind at London’s Excel centre.

There were 3,500 delegates, and 150 exhibitors from firms of every size. You only had to look around the vast exhibition hangar to see that this is a booming industry.

But why is it that, despite its growth, and despite politicians’ repeated promises, so little benefit has filtered through to places such as Methil?

The Government is clear that it wants to see a bigger UK element in offshore development, saying that in future such a requirement will be written into suppliers’ contracts. But as Gary Smith of the GMB points out, governments have said this sort of thing before.

Meanwhile, as well as making UK renewables, China is increasingly owning and controlling them too.

One of the Excel exhibitors was Red Rock Power, part of the Chinese state-owned company SDIC. It already owns several UK windfarms and is developing the multi-billion pound Inchcape field near Fife, which when finished will be — at least for a while — Scotland’s biggest. It is bidding for several more.

Mr Smith’s anger is palpable. ‘We’ve spent far too long being promised rainbows and unicorns,’ he says. ‘But they gave us empty rhetoric, never concrete planning.

‘In oil and gas we grew a world-leading industry in Aberdeen. And now we have this almost imperialist idea that China will soon be less competitive because it will follow Britain’s emissions lead — as if China’s Politburo cares what happens in 10 Downing Street.’

Back on the little hill in Methil, in a section of the yard which was once a part of BiFab, a disused oil platform is being cut up for scrap. To its left is a single, demonstration wind turbine, resting on its jacket. And that is all.

‘It doesn’t much look like the Saudi Arabia of wind, does it,’ says Mr Sullivan. ‘For now, it’s just about clinging to life.’
Daily Mail

Well, the promises seemed real enough at the time …

About stopthesethings

We are a group of citizens concerned about the rapid spread of industrial wind power generation installations across Australia.


  1. No wonder China gets to keep on using coal. The ruinable energy ‘double glazing’ salesmen know they will need a reliable baseload energy source into the future, such as coal, to build their infernal wind turbines. Whilst I feel for the workers in Methil, I for one am glad to see the demise of wind in Fife. This industry has already done more than enough environmental damage around the globe, and people are beginning to wake up to these grid saboteurs.

  2. Jacqueline Rovensky says:

    The question is why are so many people in positions that can make decisions, so blinded by the idea of jobs and wealth from Renewable energy projects that they cannot see or accept the clearly false claims and willingly spouting the lies.
    Maybe the answer is in the saying ‘follow the money’.
    Why else would they be so stupid to keep telling us everything is well and progressing to a healthy environmental future.
    For years there have been people reporting and exposing the lies – yet nothing seems to have stuck and made an impression on these policy and decision makers. No matter who you vote for the end is the same – they are blinded in some way and turn into mouth pieces of an industry controlled by a country which is so environmentally deviant a clean world environment is not on their agenda.
    From the start local jobs never reached the claimed numbers, manufacturing industries never flourished – rather jobs have been lost and businesses have closed.
    Can these people who are meant to be looking after OUR needs be trusted. Maybe the problem is they listen to advisors who are influenced by propaganda and maybe something else – or maybe they simply don’t have the capability to see through this tainted advise – it doesn’t look like it does it.
    So maybe its time they were jolted into reading and understanding what is happening and leave the highly paid advisors to rot and in doing so work for the people of their own countries not for the desires of some other country.
    The upcoming meeting in Glasgow would be the best place for all Politicians and countries representatives to recognise what is actually going on across the globe and accept as a group they have failed their people and the world community – recognising they need something more than a ‘timeline’ but need to have a good look at the make-up of their ‘group’ and change what they are actually doing.
    We need more than words we need action not only to lower emissions by using failing current ‘desired’ methods, but embrace any method which reduces current emissions and remember to ensure all countries should be able to flourish – no good having clean air if countries and their people cannot thrive.

  3. The sooner the public experience the blackouts and even higher prices of unreliable green energy the better. Only then will the apathetic among us wake from their slumber.
    There is going to be a lot of pain before that happens unfortunately.

  4. So called Green Jobs are a fallacy to begin with, the Renewables are not so why are we even going there?

  5. Marvin Wagner says:

    Since the degradation of the American middle-class standard of living would seem to be a central part of the directed economy plan of Comrade Joe and the #PLSdem syndicate; why wouldn’t they direct the nation adopt uneconomic policies of this sort that benefits only the #fascist CCP and its coterie of crony capitalists?

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: