Toxic Shock: Millions of Wind Turbine Blades Leave Poisoned Landfill Legacy For Generations To Come

Troubled teenagers demanding an all wind and sun powered future are setting themselves up for an almighty toxic shock, with hundreds of millions of wind turbine blades destined for landfill.

As Steve St. Angelo reports from the USA, wind turbine blades are non-recyclable due to the fact that they are a complex composite of highly toxic plastics, comprising fiberglass, epoxy, polyvinyl chloride foam, polyethylene terephthalate foam, balsa wood, and polyurethane coatings.

Already, thousands of 45-70m blades are being ground up and mixed with concrete used in the bases of other turbines erected later or simply dumped in landfill. Which should worry locals: the plastics in the blades are highly toxic, and contain Bisphenol A, which is so dangerous to health that the European Union and Canada have banned it.

When an ‘industry’ presents itself as being purer than driven snow, it’s understandable that the proletariat might be just a little disgruntled once they tumble to the fact that they’ve been duped. No one likes being taken for a fool.

The Renewable Green Energy Myth: 50,000 Tons Of Non-Recyclable Wind Turbine Blades Dumped In The Landfill
SRSRocco Report
Steve St. Angelo
9 January 2020

Funny, no one seemed to consider what to do with the massive amount of wind turbine blades once they reached the end of their lifespan. Thus, the irony of the present-day Green Energy Movement is the dumping of thousands of tons of “non-recyclable” supposedly renewable wind turbine blades in the country’s landfills.

Who would have thought? What’s even worse, is that the amount of wind turbine blades slated for waste disposal is forecasted to quadruple over the next fifteen years as a great deal more blades reach their 15-20 year lifespan. Furthermore, the size and length of the newly installed wind turbine blades are now twice as large as they were 20-30 years ago.

Honestly, I hadn’t considered the tremendous amount of waste generated by the so-called “Renewable” wind power industry until a long-term reader sent me the link to the following article, Landfill begins burying non-recyclable Wind Turbine Blades:

Hundreds of giant windmill blades are being shipped to a landfill in Wyoming to be buried because they simply can’t be recycled. Local media reports several wind farms in the state are sending over 900 un-reusable blades to the Casper Regional Landfill to be buried. While nearly 90 percent of old or decommissioned wind turbines, like the motor housing, can be refurbished or at least crushed, fiberglass windmill blades present a problem due to their size and strength.

“Our crushing equipment is not big enough to crush them,” a landfill representative told NPR.

Prior to burying the cumbersome, sometimes nearly 300-foot long blades, the landfill has to cut them up into smaller pieces onsite and stack them in order to save space during transportation.

Wyoming isn’t the only landfill accepting worn-out wind turbine blades. They are also being dumped in IOWA and SOUTH DAKOTA.  Although, there’s probably a lot more landfills across the country, especially in Texas, that are accepting old wind turbine blades. Texas has the largest amount of wind-generated energy in the United States at 27,036 MegaWatts, followed by Iowa (8,965 MW), Oklahoma (8,072 MW), Kansas (6,128 MW), and California (5,842 MW). (source: Wikipedia)

So, with Texas powering more wind energy than the next three states combined, they will be discarding an enormous amount of wind turbine blades in the state’s landfills over the next 10-20 years.

Now, why is the Wind Power Industry discarding its blades in landfills? Unfortunately, due to the way the blades are manufactured, it isn’t economical or practical to recycle them even though some small-scale recycling has been done. Here is an image from the Low-Tech Magazine website explaining why the large wind turbine blades aren’t recyclable:

The wind turbine blades are a toxic amalgam of unique composites, fiberglass, epoxy, polyvinyl chloride foam, polyethylene terephthalate foam, balsa wood, and polyurethane coatings. So, basically, there is just too much plastic-composite-epoxy crapola that isn’t worth recycling. Again, even though there are a few small recycling centers for wind turbine blades, it isn’t economical to do on a large scale.

As I mentioned, the wind power units built today are getting much taller and larger. Check out the 83.5 meter (274 feet) long wind turbine blade being transported for a 7 MegaWatt system:

This picture was taken in 2016. So, in about 15-20 years, this blade will need to be replaced. Just think of the cost to remove three massive blades this size, cut them up, transport them to the landfill and cover them with tons of soil. Now, multiply that by tens of thousands of blades. According to the data from Hochschule Bremerhaven & Ahlstrom-Munksjo, the wind industry will generate 50,000 tons of blade waste in 2020, but that will quadruple to 225,000 tons by 2034. I have read that some estimates show an even higher amount of blade waste over the next 10-20 years.

I don’t believe the public realizes what a horrible waste of resources that wind energy is when you start to look at the entire operation from beginning to end. Wind energy is definitely not RENEWABLE. And, even worse… the wind turbines are not lasting as long as the 20-25 years forecasted by the industry. A study that came out in 2012 by Gordon Hughes, researching the relatively mature Dutch and U.K. Wind Industry, suggested that only a few of the wind farms would be operating for more than 12-15 years.

Wind & Solar A Disaster On The Electric Grid
The one thing not mentioned by the “Renewable Energy Aficionados” is that the more solar and wind that is added to the grid, the more volatile and problematic it becomes. You see, the U.S. Electric Grid has been powered by BASELOAD energy from Coal, Natural Gas, and Nuclear… for the most part. This type of energy generation is very stable, which is precisely why it’s called BASELOAD ENERGY.

When wind and solar came onto the picture, the Renewable Energy Aficionados thought this “CLEAN GREEN ENERGY” was going to get rid of the dirty fossil fuel power plants. Unfortunately, the more wind and solar that are added, the more BASELOAD energy has to be removed. Why is that unfortunate? Because when the wind stops blowing and the sun stops shining, then the Electric Utility Industry is forced to TURN ON the Natural Gas Power Plants to make up the difference.

And let me tell you, this is becoming much more of a big problem when the wind energy that was generating 40% of the electricity in the area totally falls off the very next day when the wind stops blowing. I have read several articles showing examples of the extreme shut-in of wind and solar electric generation in a very short period of time.

There is so much information out there about this “Intermittency” problem, let me provide a perfect example taking place in Germany. Germany installed one hell of a lot of wind and solar, and it is now becoming a nightmare because they are suffering from black-outs, while at the same time their citizens are paying some of the highest electricity rates in Europe.

Germany’s Renewable Energy Disaster – Part 1: Wind & Solar Deemed ‘Technological Failures’

Germany’s wind and solar experiment have failed: the so-called ‘Energiewende’ (energy transition) has turned into an insanely costly debacle.

German power prices have rocketed; blackouts and load shedding are the norm; and idyllic rural communities are now industrial wastelands (see picture).

Hundreds of billions of euros have been squandered on subsidies to wind and solar, all in an effort to reduce carbon dioxide gas emissions. However, that objective has failed too: CO2 emissions continue to rise.

But you wouldn’t know it from what appears in the mainstream media. Its reticence to report on what’s actually going on in Germany probably stems from the adage about success having many fathers, and failure being an orphan. Having promoted Germany as the example of how we could all ‘transition’ to an all RE future, it’s pretty hard for them to suck it up and acknowledge that they were taken for fools.

REST OF ARTICLE HERE: Germany’s Renewable Energy Disaster – Part 1: Wind & Solar Deemed ‘Technological Failures’

That article above came from the website,, which I highly recommend checking out.  They put out a lot of excellent material on the global wind industry.

For example, I found this interesting article about a wind turbine that was purchased by Akron-Westfield’s School Board that went operational in 1999. The wind turbine was supposed to provide the School District with approximately (2) teachers’ salaries worth of revenue once the loan was paid off after ten years. According to the article from, Turbine Trouble: School Board’s Wind Turbine ‘Investment’ Ends in Financial Disaster:

After a decade of dashed financial hopes, mechanical failures and punishingly costly repairs, the school has been left to lick its wounds and lament. The experience to date has been a total financial failure. And now comes the whopping cleanup bill to have the nightmare removed, for good.

A-W wind turbine removal may become budget item
The Akron Home Towner
Julie Ann Madden
11 October 2019

What will it cost to remove the Akron-Westfield’s inoperable wind turbine from its site?

According to A-W School Board Member Nick Mathistad, about $220,000:

$183,000 for disassembly and disposal of the wind turbine; and
$37,000 for foundation removal/disposal, dirt fill and seeding of site.
“These are budget numbers, and the scope of work would be bid out at a later date if it comes to that,” Mathistad explained in a text to The Akron Hometowner.

I recommend reading the entire article because it is worth a GOOD LAUGH. I believe the author of the article misunderstood and thought the town of Akron was in Ohio, but it was located in Iowa. [Note to Ed: oops! The geographical error has now been fixed in the STT post, sorry for any confusion.]

Once you read the article, it plays like the typical TRAIL OF TEARS as the poor school board was plagued with mechanical failures and issues that cost one hell of a lot of money and just when the wind turbine was going to be paid off after ten years, it broke down for good… LOL.

That’s correct, and the wind turbine has been sitting there idle for nearly a decade… rotting away. And now, it seems that the school board is placing the $220,000 cost to disassemble and dispose of the wind turbine in their $5.2 million bond. Again… LOL.

I have to tell you; I am simply amazed at the level of INSANITY and STUPIDITY taking place by individuals, companies, corporations, and countries that are ramping up wind and solar energy. They are a complete disaster and will only get worse as time goes by.

Lastly, the world should have used the energy that has been investing in wind-solar and put it into transitioning our society to a smaller footprint or DEGROWTH. That was the smart and logical move. However, we are taking the last bit of good fossil fuel energy and putting into Non-Recyclable “supposedly renewable” Green Technology Boondoggles that will become serious liabilities in the future as we won’t have the available energy to properly disassemble and dispose of the tens of thousands of wind turbines dotting the landscape.
SRSRocco Report

How dare you!! One for Greta to sort out when she grows up.

14 thoughts on “Toxic Shock: Millions of Wind Turbine Blades Leave Poisoned Landfill Legacy For Generations To Come

  1. Turbine blades are being buried in the Republic landfill in Roosevelt wa with 858 turbines in Klickitat County Washington more will be buried many have already been upgraded to larger blades. There are plans for 200000 acres of farmland to be covered with solar panels which will end up in the same landfill superfine cleanup site in the making let’s not allow it to happen

  2. Green Energy Greed. How much can the environment take. Even Warren Buffet admits he’s in if for the subsidies. Wind Farm 17.5 year life cycle from digging to the dump environmentally egregious and an avian nightmare. Corrupt science’s 101.

  3. I enjoyed the article, until the end, when the author opined that resources should be spent on degrowth. Unless he’s using the word in a way with which I am not familiar, that’s Malthusian, anti-humanist garbage.

    What those resources should have been spent on are real solutions that will bring us a cleaner, more prosperous future, which is to say, building more nuclear electricity generators.

    Even if the cost of a reactor far exceeds current estimates, they operate for such a long time (at least 60 years, possibly 100 or more) that every reactor built becomes a national treasure for future generations. Unless, of course, those future generations (like this one) are stupid enough to shut them down early.

    Anyway, folks here already know that, but I thought the ending was worth razzing on a bit.

  4. I would like to know what kind of company started making these Monsters in the first place. Can’t see they were really concerned about the environment!

  5. The reference to the toxicity of Bisphenol is spurious. It (usually as Bisphenol A) is a component of the epoxy resins used with reinforcement to build the blades, but it is there with ether links which are notoriously hard to break.
    There may be some bacteria which can breakdown epoxy resin to the basic Bisphenol but it turns out to be a good disinfectant (like the old Carbolic soap types), so very unlikely for lots of bisphenol to be present at the dump, especially with the local climate.
    And for those still worried I would point out that epoxy-phenolics were used to line food cans from the 1940’s. Also for soft drink cans although they were switched to water based systems starting around 1980 (but they still contained some reacted Bisphenol based epoxy).
    For what it is worth my former Technical Director once estimated that IF that coating WAS COMPLETELY BROKEN DOWN TO THE BASE BISPHENOL you would have to drink 795,000 soft drinks in a year to cause a problem.

    1. The ban stands as per the reference linked in the post. The issue isn’t occasionally drinking fluids from tins lined with it or brief exposure through incidental contact. The issue is placing hundreds of blades in the same landfill site where their materials will decompose over centuries, leaching compounds with known toxic effects into the water table surrounding the site. It won’t be you or Greta that suffers, but future generations. And, of course, it’ll be the third world that gets used as the dumping ground, where there are no environmental standards and no one rich enough to complain. The Germans are already dumping their blades in Africa. Out of sight, out of mind.

      ‘Green’ Energy’s Poisonous Legacy: Millions of Toxic Turbine Blades Destined for African Landfills

      1. Perhaps I should have emphasisied the extreme chemical stability of the cured resin. Any breakdown would be extremely slow so levels of bisphenol wouldn’t get very high, so it in turn could be degraded by bacteria or fungi.
        The Green industry is causing far more ecological disasters than this. Perhaps the answer is to demand that Europeans bury their unwanted blades on their own soil. If they object then we can know that there is some danger.

  6. I am curious to know what the legal implications of signing a blade are. Schools, staff and others in western Victoria, have been encouraged to sign these massive blades. Ararat is one example. But what happens down the line if you change your mind about the wind farm? There is very little you can do to remove your signature from a blade when it is hanging 200m in the sky!

    Could the developer use it against you? What if you were to make a noise complaint in future? Indeed, would they even remove it upon your request?

    People should think carefully before giving away one of the most precious things they own. One of the most personal things about ‘You’.

    Your signature!

  7. Perhaps our kids’ teachers could explain these facts of life to the students before sending them out into the street to proclaim our actions are killing them.

    1. They could but I wonder just how many are also ‘blinded’ by the miss information and rhetoric being spewed by the industry and its financial backers.
      I also wonder how many teachers are actually capable of effective critical thinking the subject of what is safe for the environment and what isn’t.
      Today teachers are not independent intellectual educators they are there just to pass on the mores and dreams of others who have influenced our Universities and higher education facilities via funding of ‘research’.
      Those who rise to the level of influencing what protocols and international agreements our Governments sign off on are from such schools of influence and are capable of ensuring their ‘masters’ wishes are paramount.
      We hear a lot about returning to natural sources for our energy ie wind and solar – but what is also natural is COAL and even URANIUM, they were created over time by natural forces and today we know how to utilise them safely, where the use of man-made toxic materials used in Turbines are not safe to use and we know it, so why use them when we don’t have to?

      1. The environment (sadly) is not the concern by those that are pushing these turbines. Eliminating green house gases is the goal. You see, the next cellular generations will be using internet wavelengths that are absorbed by C02. That’s right, the most important wavelength is in the infrared range of the electromagnetic spectrum, and man made green house gases at street level need to be reduced to preindustrial levels so that 5G internet can be implemented to it’s full potential. Nice.

Leave a Reply to DeFrock Cancel reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s