Half-Baked Hoax: Claims For All Wind & Solar Powered Future Are Pure Fantasy

No country has ever powered itself entirely with wind and solar. No country ever will. The image above is not the crazed doodlings of a maniac, it’s the combined output of every wind turbine connected to Australia’s Eastern Grid last month thanks to Aneroid Energy.

Note the numerous occasions when output plummets by 2-3,000MW in minutes, often falling to between 200 and 400MW – which represents between 3 to 6% of the total 6,558MW of capacity spread from Far North Queensland, through NSW, all across Victoria, Tasmania and South Australia.

Good luck trying to explain to a nine-year-old that that picture represents their energy supply future.

But, notwithstanding the obvious and fatal flaws with chaotic wind and solar, there are still plenty of zealots out there wedded to the belief that our ‘inevitable’ transition to an all wind and sun powered future, is just around the corner. It’s a fantastic delusion, to be sure!

As Terrance Corcoran lays out below, if you believe in Unicorns, there’s a fair chance you’ll swallow to line about our ‘inevitable transition’.

Why the global fossil-fuel phase-out is a fantasy akin to time travel
Business Financial Post
Terrance Corcoran
21 June 2019

Judging from the headlines, Canada and the world are on track to ratchet up renewable energy and begin the rapid scale-down and ultimate phase-out of fossil fuels. Most energy analysts consider the fossil-fuel phase-out to be a scientific, economic and political fantasy, akin to levitation and time travel, but the movement keeps making news.

Governments everywhere — from Canada to the United Kingdom to states in Australia — are declaring climate emergencies and committing to variations on zero emissions. The international organization promoting emergency declarations claims “a fast transition to zero emissions is possible.”

Canada’s Green Party, said to be gaining ground, has a new platform plan, headlined “Mission: Possible,” to eliminate fossil fuels by 2050. A proposed Green New Deal in America aims to eliminate fossil fuels from the U.S. power grid by 2030 and phase gasoline out of the transportation sector.

NDP Leader Jagmeet Singh says Canada’s oil industry is on its way out: “It’s the direction the world is headed.” The newly announced Liberal and Conservative programs are leaning in the zero-carbon direction, although less explicitly.

So what are the carbon zeroists talking about? Aside from massive amounts of government intervention — almost a total takeover of the economy — the practicality of it all looks a bit impossible, to put it mildly. As the graph below suggests, the required technological and economic change could be a little overwhelming.

The general scale of the operation is hinted at by Climate Mobilization, an organization promoting climate emergency declarations: “Only WWII-scale Climate Mobilization can protect humanity and the natural world.”

In keeping with the analogy, here are some indicators of the magnitude of the coming Green World War III.

In Canada, for example, Vancouver energy consultant Aldyen Donnelly calculated that to achieve the “deep decarbonization” Canada is aiming for will require massive expansions of non-fossil fuel sources of energy.

To produce the electric power needed to offset the lost fossil fuel energy, Canada would have to build 2.5 hydro power dams the size of British Columbia’s $13-billion Site C project somewhere in the country “every year for the foreseeable future” leading up to the proposed 2050 carbon reduction targets. The geographic and cost obstacles send that prospect into the realm of the impossible.

On a global basis, the magnitude of the implied decarbonization effort illustrated in the graph takes us beyond the possible and into the world of junk science fiction. In 2018, world consumption of fossil fuels rose to 11,865 million tonnes of oil equivalent (mtoe). To get that down to near zero by 2050 as proposed by the zeroists would require a lot of alternative energy sources.

University of Colorado scientist Roger Pielke Jr. did some of the rough numbers. “There are 11,161 days until 2050. Getting to net zero by 2050 requires replacing one mtoe of fossil fuel consumption every day starting now.” On a global basis, such a transition would require building the equivalent of one new 1.5-gigawatt nuclear plant every day for the next 30 years.

If not nuclear, then maybe solar? According to a U.S. government site, it takes about three million solar panels to produce one gigawatt of energy, which means that by 2050 the world will need 3,000,000 X 11,865 solar panels to offset fossil fuels. The wind alternative would require about 430 new wind turbines each of the 11,865 days leading to 2050.

So far, other tested technologies do not exist to offset the fossil fuel energy that would be lost under the green zero targets. Maybe this is a world war that should be stopped before it gets out of control.
Business Financial Post

And you’ll find cost-effective battery storage, right over there.

About stopthesethings

We are a group of citizens concerned about the rapid spread of industrial wind power generation installations across Australia.


  1. swan101 says:

    Reblogged this on ECO-ENERGY DATABASE.

  2. Sweet Old Bob says:

    When did wind power become dispatchable ?

    • No mention of it being dispatchable in that article or our post, you must be referring to something else.

      • Sweet Old Bob says:

        Y-axis label says dispatchable unit MW ?
        I side with you …
        just saying source of graph labels it as such .
        Assume from pro wind source ?

      • No, not a prowind site, Aneroid uses the same graphic for all generation sources. We don’t read anything into it, the data speaks for itself.

  3. Sweet Old Bob says:

    The graph at start of article is misleading: wind power is NOT dispatchable .

  4. Andreas Demmig says:

    But that numbers assume, that it is planed, to keep the economy, respectively the people at the same level of civilization or comfort as so far. I don’t think that.
    Just like for prince Charles, for fanatics there are much to many people living on earth.
    So, about 10th of us are enough for them.
    Main thing, they will survive.
    – this gives me power, to translate and put that on (?) or at (?) our server in Germany. Thank you and best regards
    Andy, Bavaria

  5. Reblogged this on ajmarciniak.

  6. Reblogged this on Climate- Science.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: