Industrial Onslaught: Wind Turbines The Gold Standard in Rural Community Destruction

The furious reaction that erupts whenever wind developers turn up in peaceful rural communities is now one of life’s immutable laws.

Across the Land of the Free, there is a seething tide of frustration and anger that has seen thousands of community defenders rally in order to keep it that way; from Arkansas to Ohio and everywhere in between. New York is just the latest State to have misjudged the resolve of people out to protect their homes, families, their communities and the environment from the scourge of industrial wind power.

Lighthouse Wind splits towns into factions
Niagra Gazette
Tim Fenster
15 October 2018

Lyndonville: A community divided – opposing protests, foul language, heckling outside of forum.

In the hour leading up to Apex Clean Energy’s community forum Oct. 4 , two groups had gathered in the parking lot at Lyndonville’s L.A. Webber Middle-High School.

One group stood staunchly in favor of Apex’s proposed Lighthouse Wind energy project and the other stood vehemently opposed.

The opposing rallies offered perhaps the clearest image of how the proposed, 47-turbine wind farm has divided residents in the towns of Somerset and Yates.

As in past public gatherings related to Lighthouse Wind, some protesters appeared angered. Some yelled expletives at the rallies. Some made snide remarks, both at the rallies and the forum itself. And some attendees laughed mockingly when Apex briefly experienced problems with its public address system.

Neighbors on either side of the debate lamented the division and bitterness in their small, tight-knit communities (which each have just over 2,500 residents, about one-tenth of the population of the city of Lockport).

But, unsurprisingly, they blame different culprits for fomenting the division.

Wind project opponents peg the blame on Apex, highlighting its status as an outsider (the company is based in Charlottesville, Virginia) and suggesting it has bankrolled most of its supporters.

In a statement ahead of the Tuesday forum, Somerset Supervisor Daniel Engert called on the state Public Service Commission, which has authority over large-scale energy projects, to “see firsthand the depth of division caused by Apex’s divisive, dismissive and unethical behavior.”

Engert added that surveys show most residents are against the project, and he claimed its supporters either have signed leases with Apex or do not reside in the lakeside towns at all.

“Almost all, if not all, of Apex’s supporters are leaseholders who want to profit off the project or people who live outside our community,” he said.

Several project opponents at the forum expressed sympathy for the landowners who signed leases to have wind turbines sited on their property.

“I understand where farmers would need the subsidies for their land, if farming isn’t going well with them. But on the other hand, it’s a small number of people,” said Gail Upton.

Some suggested the leaseholders were getting duped by Apex.

“I don’t think farmers who have signed contracts necessarily know what they’re in for, based on what’s happened to other communities,” said Erik Sinkora. “They’re going to be locked into these 30-year contracts. If it goes forward, hopefully it’ll be everything they said it would be.”

“People who are in favor of the windmills are not listening to what has been presented at town board meetings,” said Richard Hellert.

But project supporters say opponents have abandoned civility in their fight against Apex.

Susan and Harvey Campbell of Lyndonville say they have been subjected to numerous verbal attacks, both in person and online, from opponents.

“I’ve spent a lot of time with people in Apex. None of them are vitriolic, angry, shoving down, calling people names,” Susan Campbell said. “The people I work with who are supporters are not that way. The only ones who are that way are the opposition. So in my view, they’re the ones tearing the community apart.”

Harvey Campbell said some opponents have lobbed personal insults, including a misogynistic slur, at his wife.

“It’s just ridiculous,” he said. “You go to a town board meeting, and every time you stand up to talk someone is making a wise-ass remark in the back.”

Harvey Campbell also pushed back against opponents’ claims, saying he owns too little land to be a lease-holder and that Yates Town Board meetings are often packed with Somerset residents.

The two sides frequently clash with opposing studies and reports. Opponents say wind turbines wreak havoc for migratory birds, including the massive Snowy Owl and iconic Bald Eagle. Supporters say each turbine kills only about two to five birds per year – a fraction of the fatalities from the average outdoor cat.

Opponents say the turbines generate frequent shadow flicker and loud background noise. Supporters cite Apex figures indicating that non-leaseholders would be exposed to maximum sound levels of about 45 decibels – similar to the hum of an HVAC system.

They argue about whether turbines hurt property values.

But to those on both sides of the issue, the turbines seem to be about more than the view of the horizon or impacts on wildlife – they’re about the future of their community.

Opponents view the project as a threat to two pillars of their community: nature tourism, particularly fishing, and lakeside cottages.

Hellert, who owns Ontario Shores Realty, said one client pulled out of purchasing a lakeside home after learning wind turbines may someday stand on the horizon.

“It’s a direct relationship to what’s going to happen to the market here,” Hellert said. “The company doesn’t see this. … They’re not concerned about the local people.”

Despite the disagreements, some forum attendees said it’s a shame the project has left two small towns so deeply divided.

“It’s sad,” Upton said. “It’s just very sad.”
Niagra Gazette

Wherever they go, wind power outfits keep losing the battle for hearts and minds. Which is probably down to the wind industry’s true character: a mix between a rabid wolf in sheep’s clothing and an axe-wielding psychopath masquerading as a smarmy second-hand car salesman.

Standing between a wind power outfit and an endless stream of subsidies is like standing between the fat kid and his lunch; bound to end in conflict.

These days, however, communities are armed with the knowledge that wind power is the greatest economic and environmental fraud of all time.

Those keen to protect their lives and livelihoods know full-well that wind power outfits have absolutely no interest in maintaining their communities. And a well-proven track record of destroying them; riding roughshod over the common law rights of rural citizens to sleep, live in and otherwise enjoy their homes and properties.

Those faced with the threat of industrial wind turbines being speared in their backyards have a choice. Either, they hand over the keys to their, soon to be worthless, homes, or they fight to the death to protect them. Based on the increased hostility being vented by opponents, the wind industry can expect the mother of all battles.

About stopthesethings

We are a group of citizens concerned about the rapid spread of industrial wind power generation installations across Australia.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: