Rats leaving the sinking ship

20140303-192944.jpg

The wind industry goons are concerned that the river of gold is about to dry up.

It was Bruce who pointed out that if you have a mouse plague, the way to deal with it is to remove the food source. Well it is the same with the wind industry.

20140303-193319.jpg

Run away! Run away!

Wind farm plans in tatters after subsidy rethink
Robert Mendick
March 2 2014

Plans to build wind farms in England and Scotland are being scrapped in the first sign that the Government’s proposed cut to subsidies is taking effect

Developers are abandoning plans for new wind farms in Britain because they are “no longer financially viable”.

The decision to scrap the wind farms is the first evidence that the spread of turbines across the country is being halted. It follows a radical overhaul by the Government of the consumer subsidy, worth more than £1 billion a year to wind farm owners.

Under the subsidy, wind farms are guaranteed to receive double the wholesale price for the electricity they produce. Under the new scheme, to be introduced later this year, companies will have to sell their electricity to the national grid under a competitive bidding system.

The new scheme will limit the total amount of subsidies available for green energy; previously the subsidy budget was effectively limitless.

The change has led to developers scrapping wind farm schemes amid claims that the new system will make future wind farms unprofitable.

Last week SSE, one of the big six energy companies, announced it was abandoning two wind farms in Scotland, both of which had attracted fierce local opposition.

SSE had wanted to build one farm with 27 turbines, each 400ft tall, at Dalnessie in Sutherland and the other for 12 turbines at Glen Orrin in Ross-shire. Neither will now get built. SSE said it was looking at all its other schemes on a “case by case basis”.

Community Windpower, which has a number of wind farms already in operation, has abandoned two sites in England – one for 16 turbines, each 426ft high, at a disused airfield in north Cornwall and another for 10 turbines in the Forest of Bowland, a beauty spot in Lancashire.

Both companies had sunk millions of pounds into the schemes, which were going through the planning stage. Renewable UK, the trade body, said that other wind energy companies were also reviewing future projects in the face of a squeeze on the subsidy.

Campaigners, who say wind farms are ugly, expensive and unreliable, will celebrate the demise of the schemes. Conservative MPs have been demanding cuts in wind farm subsidies to halt their spread.

The changes to the scheme will not come into full effect until 2017. Until then the new scheme will run in parallel with the existing one.

Wind farms facing the axe are likely to be ones completed after 2017 when owners will be forced to bid for subsidy from a limited pot of money. The successful bids will win subsidies at reduced rates.

The changes were ordered by the Treasury, which had become alarmed by the huge sums being offered to wind farm developers. The subsidy is added on to electricity bills, driving up household costs.

Dr John Constable, the director of the Renewable Energy Foundation think tank, which has criticised the size of wind energy subsidies, said: “Competitive tendering for renewables subsidy is bad news for many wind projects, reducing the value of the planning consent and making it much harder for developers to realise a significant profit.”

Maf Smith, deputy chief executive of RenewableUK, said: “It’s obviously concerning that projects from one of the cheapest sources of renewable energy are being withdrawn.

“There are still projects coming forward, but these recent announcements are a warning shot to the Government to make sure that their up coming reforms are done in the right way.”

A spokeswoman for the Department of Energy and Climate Change said: “Onshore wind is the cheapest large-scale renewable technology and has a key role to play in our energy mix. It is a thriving and mature industry and it is right that Government support should reduce as the cost of generating comes down.”
The Telegraph

It is the same story here in Australia. Once the RET review shows that it is time to turn off the flow of public money, the planned wind farms will be a thing of the past.

As Will Scribe says,

Wind turbine blades will no longer turn,
When the huge subsidies they can no longer earn!

20140303-193120.jpg

With the cash gone, there was nothing left to live on.

About stopthesethings

We are a group of citizens concerned about the rapid spread of industrial wind power generation installations across Australia.

Comments

  1. Hurrah – and rats they are too. Let’s hope more will follow. Both SSE’s scheme in Scotland were under scrutiny from professional planning consultant. Get the big guns out and blow the buggers away!

  2. I can’t find any mention on the site of this report by Duncan Seddon titled ‘Do wind farms/gas turbines save carbon?’ Its conclusions – only those with higher than 32% efficiency do. So for example, the wind farms near Millicent actually increase emissions.

    http://www.powertrans.com.au/UserFiles//file//PDFs//EG-4-13.pdf

    The report is on pages 23-25.

  3. Reblogged this on Quixotes Last Stand.

  4. Well, we will soon see if the wind weasel and greentard goons can survive on the rations that the coal fired power stations have survived on all these years.

  5. Geoff McPherson says:

    This the jojoba bean FRAUD being revisited again, except orders of magnitude greater.

  6. Now for my subtle paraphrase of Chapman’s logic and a slight reapplication to this scenario:

    “STT: Do you realise that you are nocebo-ising investors and using scare tactics? Terorising people away from investments by spreading true stories about financial losses and possibly an imminent industry collapse!

    This is not just irresponsible – you are harming the psychological well being of misinformed and duped investors. Why not simply allow them to loose all their money instead once the industry suddenly collapses…”

  7. Jackie Rovenksy says:

    Of course its the cheapest energy source – for the developer – as they get a huge subsidy for developing them which leaves them with next to no outlay. And that’s where the cheap energy stops.
    At last Governments around the world are working out they’ve been played for suckers, they’ve spent masses of money to appear to be doing something about the environment, but in the rush they forgot to look properly at what they have been subsidising, and it wouldn’t have taken much of a look. No in-depth checking was needed no special committees to check the viability, just a bit of common-sense was needed – hopefully they’ll not be as gullible in the future.

  8. Old Ranga says:

    Gary Weaven, here it comes.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: